What if you could lower your grocery bill without giving up the things you love, fight inflation, and have some money left at the end of the month? Sounds too good to be true? It’s not. It’s the Half Rule. This means cutting the amount of product you use in half and seeing what happens.
Truth is, most of us probably use too much of the things we love. Here are several reasons why:
Manufacturers often ask you to use more of the product than you need.
You’ve probably gotten used to using a certain amount of a product;
And finally, product inflation. Specifically, you might think that if you get pleasure out of something, you might need to use more of it. For instance, why get a tall vanilla latte when you can get a grande, right? But ask yourself: Is it really that much better?
To this end, here are some things you can easily use half of and never miss the other half:
Shampoo. Try using half the amount and adding more water, especially if it’s concentrated.
Laundry detergent. Try a half cup. A little goes a long way, especially if it’s a small load.
Dryer sheets. These are so easy to tear in half.
Cooking oil. Use an oil mister instead of pouring it into your pan or skillet.
Restaurant meals. Eat half or a third and save the rest for another meal. Or better yet, split a meal with your partner, friend or work colleague. Bonus: you’ll also save calories.
Bagels. Just eat half! Save the other half for your next snack or breakfast.
Starbucks order. Try a tall. Or if you get a vente, try a grande. Give it a whirl. See what happens.
Glass stovetop cleaner. If you use less, you might have fewer streaks.
Tape. When you’re wrapping gifts, give string a try.
When you change a few things here and there, over time, you’ll really see the difference in your bank account. Also, imagine how nice it’ll feel not to have to buy these items so often. That’s a big change in spending.
The Half Rule is not for everything. While it works on so many things, there are some things you cannot to apply it to – like filling up your gas tank or cutting a prescription in half. Never do that.
Overall, it’s a good rule. And when you’re persistent over time, you’ll start to develop a habit – one that will help you see a difference quickly and save you money in the long run. It’s a ripple effect that might expand into other areas of your life. In sum, the Half Rule is so effective, you just might go all in – and stay there.
Sources
“The Half Rule” – A Frugal Hack I Live By
How to Save Money with the Half Rule
October 1, 2025 · Blog, Tip of the Month
⏱ 3 min read
What if you could lower your grocery bill without giving up the things you love, fight inflation, and have some money left at the end of the month? Sounds too good to be true? It’s not. It’s the Half Rule. This means cutting the amount of product you use in half and seeing what happens.
Truth is, most of us probably use too much of the things we love. Here are several reasons why:
Manufacturers often ask you to use more of the product than you need.
You’ve probably gotten used to using a certain amount of a product;
And finally, product inflation. Specifically, you might think that if you get pleasure out of something, you might need to use more of it. For instance, why get a tall vanilla latte when you can get a grande, right? But ask yourself: Is it really that much better?
To this end, here are some things you can easily use half of and never miss the other half:
Shampoo. Try using half the amount and adding more water, especially if it’s concentrated.
Laundry detergent. Try a half cup. A little goes a long way, especially if it’s a small load.
Dryer sheets. These are so easy to tear in half.
Cooking oil. Use an oil mister instead of pouring it into your pan or skillet.
Restaurant meals. Eat half or a third and save the rest for another meal. Or better yet, split a meal with your partner, friend or work colleague. Bonus: you’ll also save calories.
Bagels. Just eat half! Save the other half for your next snack or breakfast.
Starbucks order. Try a tall. Or if you get a vente, try a grande. Give it a whirl. See what happens.
Glass stovetop cleaner. If you use less, you might have fewer streaks.
Tape. When you’re wrapping gifts, give string a try.
When you change a few things here and there, over time, you’ll really see the difference in your bank account. Also, imagine how nice it’ll feel not to have to buy these items so often. That’s a big change in spending.
The Half Rule is not for everything. While it works on so many things, there are some things you cannot to apply it to – like filling up your gas tank or cutting a prescription in half. Never do that.
Overall, it’s a good rule. And when you’re persistent over time, you’ll start to develop a habit – one that will help you see a difference quickly and save you money in the long run. It’s a ripple effect that might expand into other areas of your life. In sum, the Half Rule is so effective, you just might go all in – and stay there.
Sources
“The Half Rule” – A Frugal Hack I Live By
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
When it comes to running a business, having outstanding invoices that turn into uncollectible receivables or simply bad debt is a fact of life. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a safe harbor that permits businesses to reduce consideration of such bad debt from taxation if it qualifies. However, understanding how to determine if a business is eligible is essential to making the most of it when a business files its taxes.
Defining the Nonaccrual Experience Method (NAE)
When businesses perform a service, they expect to be paid. However, they sometimes have unpaid invoices that are uncollectible. One provision within the IRS’s Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is that of the nonaccrual experience method (NAE) and how it intersects with bad debts.
How It Works
Once a company sees bad debt in its system after customers fail to pay their invoices, it calculates the amounts it projects it won’t be able to collect. Projecting bad debt is accomplished by the company looking at previous experiences with its payees. It’s important to note that this accounting is used by businesses for only a portion of their projected uncollectable customer bad debt; businesses similarly project the remaining percentage they expect to collect from outstanding invoices in the future.
One important step for businesses to determine their eligibility for relief from the accrual segment of uncollectible revenue, per the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), is by determining their industry classification. Sample industries include legal professionals, engineers, performance art professionals, architects, and actuaries.
It’s important to note that if businesses don’t use this method, they may charge off such debts. Charge-offs are when a company writes the debt off its balance sheet and expenses the uncollectible funds on the income statement. Companies must also adhere to the following criteria to take advantage of the safe harbor:
The company must currently use the accrual method of accounting when recording revenues, and not the cash method to account for revenue.
The company, in a single year, within the past 36 months, has earned up to, but no more than $5 million in gross receipts.
IRS Guidance
Beginning in September 2011, the Internal Revenue Service permitted taxpayers to use the NAE method to determine applicability by applying a factor of 95 percent to their allowance for bad debts via their past 60 months of financial documents. This permits businesses to exclude qualifying uncollectible revenues from their taxable income, which is beneficial for lowering the amount of taxes owed. It is often easier for NAE-specific designated industries to qualify; however, only companies with the appropriate amount of historical information to substantiate are eligible.
Further Considerations and Conclusion
One example of this safe harbor includes having financial information that’s expertly tracked for the past 60 months via financial statements. If the company can’t substantiate it, they won’t be able to qualify. Similarly, eligible services provided or the resulting receivables that have interest and/or financial penalties attached are ineligible.
When it comes to navigating the IRS code, the NAE can provide another way for eligible companies to maximize filings and tax obligations.
A Look at the Nonaccrual Experience Method
October 1, 2025 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 3 min read
When it comes to running a business, having outstanding invoices that turn into uncollectible receivables or simply bad debt is a fact of life. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a safe harbor that permits businesses to reduce consideration of such bad debt from taxation if it qualifies. However, understanding how to determine if a business is eligible is essential to making the most of it when a business files its taxes.
Defining the Nonaccrual Experience Method (NAE)
When businesses perform a service, they expect to be paid. However, they sometimes have unpaid invoices that are uncollectible. One provision within the IRS’s Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is that of the nonaccrual experience method (NAE) and how it intersects with bad debts.
How It Works
Once a company sees bad debt in its system after customers fail to pay their invoices, it calculates the amounts it projects it won’t be able to collect. Projecting bad debt is accomplished by the company looking at previous experiences with its payees. It’s important to note that this accounting is used by businesses for only a portion of their projected uncollectable customer bad debt; businesses similarly project the remaining percentage they expect to collect from outstanding invoices in the future.
One important step for businesses to determine their eligibility for relief from the accrual segment of uncollectible revenue, per the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), is by determining their industry classification. Sample industries include legal professionals, engineers, performance art professionals, architects, and actuaries.
It’s important to note that if businesses don’t use this method, they may charge off such debts. Charge-offs are when a company writes the debt off its balance sheet and expenses the uncollectible funds on the income statement. Companies must also adhere to the following criteria to take advantage of the safe harbor:
The company must currently use the accrual method of accounting when recording revenues, and not the cash method to account for revenue.
The company, in a single year, within the past 36 months, has earned up to, but no more than $5 million in gross receipts.
IRS Guidance
Beginning in September 2011, the Internal Revenue Service permitted taxpayers to use the NAE method to determine applicability by applying a factor of 95 percent to their allowance for bad debts via their past 60 months of financial documents. This permits businesses to exclude qualifying uncollectible revenues from their taxable income, which is beneficial for lowering the amount of taxes owed. It is often easier for NAE-specific designated industries to qualify; however, only companies with the appropriate amount of historical information to substantiate are eligible.
Further Considerations and Conclusion
One example of this safe harbor includes having financial information that’s expertly tracked for the past 60 months via financial statements. If the company can’t substantiate it, they won’t be able to qualify. Similarly, eligible services provided or the resulting receivables that have interest and/or financial penalties attached are ineligible.
When it comes to navigating the IRS code, the NAE can provide another way for eligible companies to maximize filings and tax obligations.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Life insurance is something most of us don’t want to talk about. But the truth is, no one gets out of life alive. So, it might make sense to face it now so that when you really need it, it’s there. Before you start looking for a life insurance policy, let’s dispel some of the untruths you might have heard.
Myth #1: It’s too expensive. According to a recent survey by Life Insurance Marketing and Research Association (LIMRA), 52 percent of people thought it was too expensive to have or get more of. And how did they come to this conclusion? They based this on their “gut instinct,” or a “wild guess.” Truth is, it’s more affordable than you think and varies from person to person. In fact, the estimated yearly cost of a $500,000, 30-year term insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old, non-smoking female is $316.
Myth #2: It’s a pain to apply. Not true. Thanks to the pandemic, which caused us to eliminate or reduce human interactions (like getting a doctor’s exam for term policies), you can apply online. These days, all you have to do is answer a few questions on your phone. Easy peasy.
Myth #3: My company’s policy is enough. Maybe. The coverage you have might not be enough for your family. Here are some facts. The median workplace life insurance coverage is either just a flat sum of $20,000 or one year’s salary.Of U.S. households that rely on workplace life insurance coverage, 44 percent say their families would struggle financially in less than six months should a wage earner die unexpectedly. So, what to do? A simple guideline is this: Aim for 10 to 12 times your annual salary and bonus, but people who are younger (farther away from retirement) might need more. Folks closer to retirement might need less.
Myth #4: I only need coverage if I’m working. If you’re not employed outside the home – like if you’re a stay-at-home mom – it’s still important to consider life insurance. Typically, life insurance is considered a replacement for lost income. If something happens to the non-breadwinner, it could also be necessary to pay for childcare and household work in your absence. The most important thing is to plan your coverage together with your family in mind so that you’re both in the best position possible should one of you pass away.
Myth #5: I don’t need life insurance until I’m older or become a parent. Nope. In fact, not only do you not have to be a parent, but your beneficiary could also be your partner or anyone else who relies on you. And you can change your beneficiaries (you can have more than one), should things change. Plus, if you apply for life insurance earlier in life, you’ll save money on premiums. Why? Because one thing that factors into how much you pay – or qualify for coverage at all – is your health. As you get older, your risk for developing health issues increases. According to LIMRA, 40 percent of those who have policies wish they’d bought them when they were younger.
In the end, you’ll want to take care of those who depend on you – and those you love. That’s why knowing the truth about life insurance matters.
Life insurance is something most of us don’t want to talk about. But the truth is, no one gets out of life alive. So, it might make sense to face it now so that when you really need it, it’s there. Before you start looking for a life insurance policy, let’s dispel some of the untruths you might have heard.
Myth #1: It’s too expensive. According to a recent survey by Life Insurance Marketing and Research Association (LIMRA), 52 percent of people thought it was too expensive to have or get more of. And how did they come to this conclusion? They based this on their “gut instinct,” or a “wild guess.” Truth is, it’s more affordable than you think and varies from person to person. In fact, the estimated yearly cost of a $500,000, 30-year term insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old, non-smoking female is $316.
Myth #2: It’s a pain to apply. Not true. Thanks to the pandemic, which caused us to eliminate or reduce human interactions (like getting a doctor’s exam for term policies), you can apply online. These days, all you have to do is answer a few questions on your phone. Easy peasy.
Myth #3: My company’s policy is enough. Maybe. The coverage you have might not be enough for your family. Here are some facts. The median workplace life insurance coverage is either just a flat sum of $20,000 or one year’s salary.Of U.S. households that rely on workplace life insurance coverage, 44 percent say their families would struggle financially in less than six months should a wage earner die unexpectedly. So, what to do? A simple guideline is this: Aim for 10 to 12 times your annual salary and bonus, but people who are younger (farther away from retirement) might need more. Folks closer to retirement might need less.
Myth #4: I only need coverage if I’m working. If you’re not employed outside the home – like if you’re a stay-at-home mom – it’s still important to consider life insurance. Typically, life insurance is considered a replacement for lost income. If something happens to the non-breadwinner, it could also be necessary to pay for childcare and household work in your absence. The most important thing is to plan your coverage together with your family in mind so that you’re both in the best position possible should one of you pass away.
Myth #5: I don’t need life insurance until I’m older or become a parent. Nope. In fact, not only do you not have to be a parent, but your beneficiary could also be your partner or anyone else who relies on you. And you can change your beneficiaries (you can have more than one), should things change. Plus, if you apply for life insurance earlier in life, you’ll save money on premiums. Why? Because one thing that factors into how much you pay – or qualify for coverage at all – is your health. As you get older, your risk for developing health issues increases. According to LIMRA, 40 percent of those who have policies wish they’d bought them when they were younger.
In the end, you’ll want to take care of those who depend on you – and those you love. That’s why knowing the truth about life insurance matters.
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – A rescission bill cancels funding previously approved by Congress upon request by the president. Congress has 45 continuous legislative days to enact or reject the proposal, during which time the funds may be temporarily withheld. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on June 6, the House passed this bill on June 12 and the Senate passed it on July 17. Signed into law on July 24, this bill cancels nearly $9 billion in funding for a variety of programs, including foreign aid and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (HR 517) – On July 24, the president signed into law this bill that allows taxpayers to postpone their filings if their state governor has declared a natural disaster, rather than waiting for the president to declare a federal disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Kustoff on Jan. 16, passed in the House on March 31 and in the Senate on July 10.
Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Control Transparency Act (HR 1316) – Introduced by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) on Feb. 13, this legislation is designed to crack down on U.S. adversaries acquiring cutting-edge technology. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Commerce submit an annual report to Congress detailing dual-use export license applications and other requests for authorization for the export, re-export, release and in-country transfer of controlled items to arms-embargoed countries such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. The legislation was passed in the House on May 5, the Senate on May 22 and was signed into law on Aug. 19.
PRO Veterans Act of 2025 (S 423) – The purpose of this act is to prevent fraud and abuse via increased oversight of the Veterans Affairs Department, including critical skill bonuses paid out to senior executives. Moreover, the bill requires quarterly, in-person briefings to congressional veterans’ committees regarding VA departmental budget shortfalls. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) on Feb. 5, passed in the Senate on April 8 and in the House on July 21. The bill was enacted on Aug. 19.
VA Home Loan Program Reform Act (HR 1815) – This bill was introduced on March 3 by Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), passed in the House on May 19, the Senate on July 15, and signed into law on July 30. The law reauthorizes the VA home loan partial claim and Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) programs. These programs are designed to help distressed veteran homeowners avoid foreclosure by enabling the VA to purchase a portion of indebtedness (25 percent to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance) of a VA home loan secured by the primary residence of the borrower.
Improving Veterans’ Experience Act of 2025 (S 264) – This bill is meant to improve satisfaction with VA benefits and services by compiling feedback from veterans, families and caregivers. This legislation establishes a Veterans Experience Office (VEO) to manage customer experience initiatives, collect data and coordinate VA departments in order to prevent duplicate efforts and ensure consistent improvements across the board. The bill was introduced on Jan. 28 by Sen. Angus King (I-ME), passed in the Senate on April 8, the House on July 21 and was enacted on Aug. 14.
ACES Act of 2025 (S 201) – This act was introduced by Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) on Jan. 23. It directs the secretary of the VA to study cancer and mortality rates among aviators and aircrews who served in the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps; and to correlate incidents of cancer among this select group of military personnel. The legislation passed in the Senate on June 3, the House on July 21, and was signed by the president on Aug. 14.
Canceling Government Funding and Expanding Protections for Veterans
September 1, 2025 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 3 min read
Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – A rescission bill cancels funding previously approved by Congress upon request by the president. Congress has 45 continuous legislative days to enact or reject the proposal, during which time the funds may be temporarily withheld. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on June 6, the House passed this bill on June 12 and the Senate passed it on July 17. Signed into law on July 24, this bill cancels nearly $9 billion in funding for a variety of programs, including foreign aid and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (HR 517) – On July 24, the president signed into law this bill that allows taxpayers to postpone their filings if their state governor has declared a natural disaster, rather than waiting for the president to declare a federal disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. David Kustoff on Jan. 16, passed in the House on March 31 and in the Senate on July 10.
Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Control Transparency Act (HR 1316) – Introduced by Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) on Feb. 13, this legislation is designed to crack down on U.S. adversaries acquiring cutting-edge technology. The bill mandates that the Secretary of Commerce submit an annual report to Congress detailing dual-use export license applications and other requests for authorization for the export, re-export, release and in-country transfer of controlled items to arms-embargoed countries such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea. The legislation was passed in the House on May 5, the Senate on May 22 and was signed into law on Aug. 19.
PRO Veterans Act of 2025 (S 423) – The purpose of this act is to prevent fraud and abuse via increased oversight of the Veterans Affairs Department, including critical skill bonuses paid out to senior executives. Moreover, the bill requires quarterly, in-person briefings to congressional veterans’ committees regarding VA departmental budget shortfalls. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) on Feb. 5, passed in the Senate on April 8 and in the House on July 21. The bill was enacted on Aug. 19.
VA Home Loan Program Reform Act (HR 1815) – This bill was introduced on March 3 by Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI), passed in the House on May 19, the Senate on July 15, and signed into law on July 30. The law reauthorizes the VA home loan partial claim and Veterans Affairs Servicing Purchase (VASP) programs. These programs are designed to help distressed veteran homeowners avoid foreclosure by enabling the VA to purchase a portion of indebtedness (25 percent to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance) of a VA home loan secured by the primary residence of the borrower.
Improving Veterans’ Experience Act of 2025 (S 264) – This bill is meant to improve satisfaction with VA benefits and services by compiling feedback from veterans, families and caregivers. This legislation establishes a Veterans Experience Office (VEO) to manage customer experience initiatives, collect data and coordinate VA departments in order to prevent duplicate efforts and ensure consistent improvements across the board. The bill was introduced on Jan. 28 by Sen. Angus King (I-ME), passed in the Senate on April 8, the House on July 21 and was enacted on Aug. 14.
ACES Act of 2025 (S 201) – This act was introduced by Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) on Jan. 23. It directs the secretary of the VA to study cancer and mortality rates among aviators and aircrews who served in the Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps; and to correlate incidents of cancer among this select group of military personnel. The legislation passed in the Senate on June 3, the House on July 21, and was signed by the president on Aug. 14.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Based on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.
When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.
If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.
Accounting Standards
Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).
One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.
With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.
Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing
To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.
Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).
Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:
$200,000 spent on R&D
$40,000 residual value
Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.
Conclusion
Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.
Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and Development
September 1, 2025 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 4 min read
Based on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.
When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.
If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.
Accounting Standards
Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).
One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.
With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.
Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing
To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.
Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).
Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:
$200,000 spent on R&D
$40,000 residual value
Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.
Conclusion
Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
What if you could lower your grocery bill without giving up the things you love, fight inflation, and have some money left at the end of the month? Sounds too good to be true? It’s not. It’s the Half Rule. This means cutting the amount of product you use in half and seeing what happens.
When it comes to running a business, having outstanding invoices that turn into uncollectible receivables or simply bad debt is a fact of life. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a safe harbor that permits businesses to reduce consideration of such bad debt from taxation if it qualifies. However, understanding how to determine if a business is eligible is essential to making the most of it when a business files its taxes.
Life insurance is something most of us don’t want to talk about. But the truth is, no one gets out of life alive. So, it might make sense to face it now so that when you really need it, it’s there. Before you start looking for a life insurance policy, let’s dispel some of the untruths you might have heard.
Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – A rescission bill cancels funding previously approved by Congress upon request by the president. Congress has 45 continuous legislative days to enact or reject the proposal, during which time the funds may be temporarily withheld. Introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) on June 6, the House passed this bill on June 12 and the Senate passed it on July 17. Signed into law on July 24, this bill cancels nearly $9 billion in funding for a variety of programs, including foreign aid and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Based on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.