Running a small business often means working with a mix of people: some full-time staff, part-time helpers, seasonal workers or project-based contractors. While this flexibility helps manage costs and workload, it creates a crucial decision point that many business owners underestimate: properly classifying each worker.
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Companies like FedEx have paid nearly half a billion dollars for getting this wrong, and even tech giants like Microsoft and Lyft have faced costly legal battles over worker misclassification.
Why Classification Matters More Than You Think
The difference between an employee and an independent contractor goes far beyond semantics; it fundamentally changes your legal and financial obligations.
When someone is your employee, you must:
Withhold income taxes, Social Security, and Medicare taxes
Pay the employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes
Potentially provide benefits like health insurance and retirement plans
Consider offering stock options or other incentive programs
Pay severance or unemployment compensation when appropriate
Comply with wage and overtime requirements
When someone is an independent contractor, you:
Simply pay them for their work
Issue a 1099-NEC form at year-end
Have no tax withholding obligations
Owe no employment benefits
Face no severance obligations
The Control Test: Your North Star for Classification
The Internal Revenue Service uses one primary principle: control. The more control you exercise over how, when, and where work gets done, the more likely that person is your employee.
Think of it this way: if you’re micromanaging the work process, you’re probably dealing with an employee. If you’re only concerned with the end result, you’re likely working with a contractor. The 20 factors identified by the IRS in Revenue Ruling 87-41 can be found in full here.
The IRS Three-Factor Framework
Rather than getting lost in complicated checklists, focus on these three core areas:
1. Behavioral Control – Do you dictate not just what work gets done, but how it’s performed? Employees typically receive training, follow company procedures, and work within established systems. Contractors bring their own methods and expertise.
2. Financial Control – Who controls the business aspects of the work? Independent contractors typically:
Invest in their own tools and equipment
Handle their own business expenses
Have multiple clients or income sources
Set their own rates and payment terms
3. Relationship Type – What does your working relationship look like? Employee relationships typically feature:
Written employment contracts
Ongoing work arrangements
Benefits packages
Work that’s central to your business operations
Beyond Taxes: The Broader Impact
Worker classification affects more than your tax bill. The Department of Labor’s 2024 updates to the Fair Labor Standards Act mean misclassification can trigger wage and overtime violations. State labor departments are also cracking down, with some states presuming workers are employees unless proven otherwise.
When Things Go Wrong: Your Options
If you realize you’ve made a mistake, don’t panic. You have several paths forward:
Get an Official Determination: File Form SS-8 with the IRS for an official ruling on a worker’s status. While it takes at least six months, you’ll have certainty going forward.
Claim Safe Harbor Protection: If you had a reasonable basis for your classification and treated similar workers consistently, you may qualify for tax relief under Section 530.
Use the Voluntary Settlement Program: The IRS Voluntary Classification Settlement Program lets you reclassify workers prospectively while receiving some tax relief.
The Bottom Line
Your worker classification isn’t just an administrative detail – it’s a fundamental business decision with major financial implications. When in doubt, err on the side of caution or consult with employment law and tax professionals.
The cost of getting expert advice upfront is minimal compared to the potential cost of getting it wrong.
Navigating Worker Classification: The Critical Difference Between Employees and Independent Contractors
July 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
Running a small business often means working with a mix of people: some full-time staff, part-time helpers, seasonal workers or project-based contractors. While this flexibility helps manage costs and workload, it creates a crucial decision point that many business owners underestimate: properly classifying each worker.
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Companies like FedEx have paid nearly half a billion dollars for getting this wrong, and even tech giants like Microsoft and Lyft have faced costly legal battles over worker misclassification.
Why Classification Matters More Than You Think
The difference between an employee and an independent contractor goes far beyond semantics; it fundamentally changes your legal and financial obligations.
When someone is your employee, you must:
Withhold income taxes, Social Security, and Medicare taxes
Pay the employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes
Potentially provide benefits like health insurance and retirement plans
Consider offering stock options or other incentive programs
Pay severance or unemployment compensation when appropriate
Comply with wage and overtime requirements
When someone is an independent contractor, you:
Simply pay them for their work
Issue a 1099-NEC form at year-end
Have no tax withholding obligations
Owe no employment benefits
Face no severance obligations
The Control Test: Your North Star for Classification
The Internal Revenue Service uses one primary principle: control. The more control you exercise over how, when, and where work gets done, the more likely that person is your employee.
Think of it this way: if you’re micromanaging the work process, you’re probably dealing with an employee. If you’re only concerned with the end result, you’re likely working with a contractor. The 20 factors identified by the IRS in Revenue Ruling 87-41 can be found in full here.
The IRS Three-Factor Framework
Rather than getting lost in complicated checklists, focus on these three core areas:
1. Behavioral Control – Do you dictate not just what work gets done, but how it’s performed? Employees typically receive training, follow company procedures, and work within established systems. Contractors bring their own methods and expertise.
2. Financial Control – Who controls the business aspects of the work? Independent contractors typically:
Invest in their own tools and equipment
Handle their own business expenses
Have multiple clients or income sources
Set their own rates and payment terms
3. Relationship Type – What does your working relationship look like? Employee relationships typically feature:
Written employment contracts
Ongoing work arrangements
Benefits packages
Work that’s central to your business operations
Beyond Taxes: The Broader Impact
Worker classification affects more than your tax bill. The Department of Labor’s 2024 updates to the Fair Labor Standards Act mean misclassification can trigger wage and overtime violations. State labor departments are also cracking down, with some states presuming workers are employees unless proven otherwise.
When Things Go Wrong: Your Options
If you realize you’ve made a mistake, don’t panic. You have several paths forward:
Get an Official Determination: File Form SS-8 with the IRS for an official ruling on a worker’s status. While it takes at least six months, you’ll have certainty going forward.
Claim Safe Harbor Protection: If you had a reasonable basis for your classification and treated similar workers consistently, you may qualify for tax relief under Section 530.
Use the Voluntary Settlement Program: The IRS Voluntary Classification Settlement Program lets you reclassify workers prospectively while receiving some tax relief.
The Bottom Line
Your worker classification isn’t just an administrative detail – it’s a fundamental business decision with major financial implications. When in doubt, err on the side of caution or consult with employment law and tax professionals.
The cost of getting expert advice upfront is minimal compared to the potential cost of getting it wrong.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
HALT Fentanyl Act (S 331) – On Jan. 30, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) introduced this bipartisan act in order to close a loophole that allowed clandestine drug manufacturers to evade illegal drug laws by altering the chemical composition of fentanyl. The legislation permanently classifies all versions of fentanyl as a Schedule I substance, much like heroin and LSD. The bill passed in the Senate on March 14 and in the House on June 12. It currently awaits the president’s signature for enactment.
TAKE IT DOWN Act (S 146) – This legislation was signed into law on May 19. Introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Jan. 16, the bipartisan bill authorizes the internet removal of visual depictions, generated by AI, of intimate acts of identifiable people without their consent.
No Tax on Tips Act (S 129) – Introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Jan. 16, this is a stand-alone bill that features the popular provision to provide a $25,000 deduction to non-itemized tax filers who work in common industries where cash tips represent a portion of their income. Note that Social Security and Medicare taxes (FICA) would still be deducted from those tips. The bill passed in the Senate on May 20 and currently lies in the House, where it conflicts with the current House-passed budget reconciliation bill being debated in the Senate.
Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – This bill would give Congressional consent to rescind previously approved funding for various government agencies and programs, in alignment with the president’s agenda, including USAID and the Public Broadcasting System (PBS). The bill was introduced on June 6 by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), passed in the House on June 12, and currently lies with the Senate.
Connecting Small Businesses with Career and Technical Education Graduates Act of 2025 (HR 1672) – This act is designed to amend the Small Business Act to require that information relating to graduates of career and technical education programs be relayed to small business and women’s business development centers. The goal is to enable hiring of more graduates of career and technical education programs by small businesses. Introduced on Feb. 26 by Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX), this bill passed in the House on June 3 and is under consideration in the Senate.
CEASE Act of 2025 (H 2987) – Introduced on April 24 by Rep. Robert Bresnahan (R-PA), this legislation would limit (to 16) the number of for-profit small business lending companies (SBLCs) that can offer small business loans without further Congressional approval. America’s Credit Unions support the act because they say the SBA has in the past expanded the SBLC license pool without “sufficient guardrails” to regulate fintech lenders, which have been disproportionately associated with fraudulent loans. The bill passed in the House on June 5 and is now in the Senate.
7(a) Loan Agent Oversight Act (HR 1804) – This bill requires the SBA’s Office of Credit Risk Management to provide Congress with an annual report on SBA 7(a) loans generated through loan agent activity. Specifically, the report would collect and analyze the necessary data to ensure oversight for fraudulent loans, default rates, and risk analysis of SBLC loan agents. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tim Moore (R-NC) on March 3 and passed in the House on June 3. It now lies with the Senate.
American Entrepreneurs First Act of 2025 (HR 2966) – On June 6, the House passed this bill, designed to require SBA loan applicants to provide citizenship status documentation. It was introduced by Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) on April 17 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.
DETERRENCE Act (S 1136) – Introduced by Sen. Margaret Hassan (D-NH) on March 26, this bipartisan bill would step up criminal penalties for federal crimes funded, conducted, or perpetrated in concert with foreign governments. The acronym stands for “Deterring External Threats and Ensuring Robust Responses to Egregious and Nefarious Criminal Endeavors,” and includes crimes such as murder, kidnapping, or threatening violence against certain present and former federal officials or their families. The act passed in the Senate on June 10 and is under consideration in the House.
Preventing AI Deepfakes, Deterring Fentanyl and Foreign Aggression, and Strengthening Small Businesses
July 1, 2025 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 4 min read
HALT Fentanyl Act (S 331) – On Jan. 30, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) introduced this bipartisan act in order to close a loophole that allowed clandestine drug manufacturers to evade illegal drug laws by altering the chemical composition of fentanyl. The legislation permanently classifies all versions of fentanyl as a Schedule I substance, much like heroin and LSD. The bill passed in the Senate on March 14 and in the House on June 12. It currently awaits the president’s signature for enactment.
TAKE IT DOWN Act (S 146) – This legislation was signed into law on May 19. Introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Jan. 16, the bipartisan bill authorizes the internet removal of visual depictions, generated by AI, of intimate acts of identifiable people without their consent.
No Tax on Tips Act (S 129) – Introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) on Jan. 16, this is a stand-alone bill that features the popular provision to provide a $25,000 deduction to non-itemized tax filers who work in common industries where cash tips represent a portion of their income. Note that Social Security and Medicare taxes (FICA) would still be deducted from those tips. The bill passed in the Senate on May 20 and currently lies in the House, where it conflicts with the current House-passed budget reconciliation bill being debated in the Senate.
Rescissions Act of 2025 (HR 4) – This bill would give Congressional consent to rescind previously approved funding for various government agencies and programs, in alignment with the president’s agenda, including USAID and the Public Broadcasting System (PBS). The bill was introduced on June 6 by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), passed in the House on June 12, and currently lies with the Senate.
Connecting Small Businesses with Career and Technical Education Graduates Act of 2025 (HR 1672) – This act is designed to amend the Small Business Act to require that information relating to graduates of career and technical education programs be relayed to small business and women’s business development centers. The goal is to enable hiring of more graduates of career and technical education programs by small businesses. Introduced on Feb. 26 by Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX), this bill passed in the House on June 3 and is under consideration in the Senate.
CEASE Act of 2025 (H 2987) – Introduced on April 24 by Rep. Robert Bresnahan (R-PA), this legislation would limit (to 16) the number of for-profit small business lending companies (SBLCs) that can offer small business loans without further Congressional approval. America’s Credit Unions support the act because they say the SBA has in the past expanded the SBLC license pool without “sufficient guardrails” to regulate fintech lenders, which have been disproportionately associated with fraudulent loans. The bill passed in the House on June 5 and is now in the Senate.
7(a) Loan Agent Oversight Act (HR 1804) – This bill requires the SBA’s Office of Credit Risk Management to provide Congress with an annual report on SBA 7(a) loans generated through loan agent activity. Specifically, the report would collect and analyze the necessary data to ensure oversight for fraudulent loans, default rates, and risk analysis of SBLC loan agents. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tim Moore (R-NC) on March 3 and passed in the House on June 3. It now lies with the Senate.
American Entrepreneurs First Act of 2025 (HR 2966) – On June 6, the House passed this bill, designed to require SBA loan applicants to provide citizenship status documentation. It was introduced by Rep. Beth Van Duyne (R-TX) on April 17 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.
DETERRENCE Act (S 1136) – Introduced by Sen. Margaret Hassan (D-NH) on March 26, this bipartisan bill would step up criminal penalties for federal crimes funded, conducted, or perpetrated in concert with foreign governments. The acronym stands for “Deterring External Threats and Ensuring Robust Responses to Egregious and Nefarious Criminal Endeavors,” and includes crimes such as murder, kidnapping, or threatening violence against certain present and former federal officials or their families. The act passed in the Senate on June 10 and is under consideration in the House.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Working capital is the difference between a business’ current assets and liabilities. Negative working capital can happen when a business’ current assets are below its current liabilities. Therefore, working Capital = Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable. It’s a way to measure a company’s ability to meet short-term liabilities, such as managing inventory, satisfying vendor bills, etc., and how well its longer-term investments are implemented.
When a business has a surplus of current assets against its current liabilities, it’s said to have positive working capital. Generally speaking, when it’s positive, the business is able to service liabilities over the next 12 months, putting it in a good financial position. However, it’s important to understand how positive working capital is comprised. If a business has a sizeable outstanding accounts receivable account or has too much inventory, the company’s resources are not utilized efficiently. With money tied up in such areas and not financed by short-term liabilities, but with long-term capital, the long-term capital can’t be used for long-term investments.
When working capital is either even or negative, it’s a way to gauge how (in)efficiently a business handles near-term financial obligations. Reasons why negative working capital exists include a business making one-time cash payments due to a business’ current assets markedly dropping. Similarly, current liabilities can increase massively with more accounts payable and increasing credit.
Delving into Negative Working Capital
When analyzing negative working capital, it’s important to see how it’s connected to the current ratio. The current ratio is a business’ current assets divided by its current liabilities. When the current ratio’s calculation is less than 1.0, the business has more current liabilities than current assets, resulting in negative working capital.
Temporary negative working capital may exist when a company spends excessively or sees a steep increase in outstanding bills due to buying input materials and services from its suppliers. Though extended periods of negative working capital could be a red flag because the business might have a problem paying immediate bills and is being forced to depend on financing or raising funds via equity issuances to manage its working capital, it gives insight into the company’s financial barometer.
Negative Working Capital Requires Judgment
Depending on the type of business and its working capital levels, a negative working capital figure may or may not indicate there’s a concern. Retail, grocery, and subscription negative working capital may not be bad; however, for capital-intensive companies, negative working capital might indicate trouble. One way to measure working-level capital is through the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC). The CCC determines whether negative working capital is from efficient operations or cash flow constraints.
It looks at:
1. Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) or how long the inventory waits before a sale is made.
2. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) or how long before an invoice is paid to the company.
3. Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) or how many days it takes a company to pay its vendors’ invoices.
Where: CCC = DIO + DSO – DPO
If the resulting number from the CCC is negative, it indicates the company is receiving payments from its customers well before it needs to pay vendors/suppliers. A company with this type of result is in good shape financially. However, if the CCC is positive and meets some of the criteria, it would require further investigation to see if the negative working capital is worrisome. Examples of a company’s poor operation include higher accounts payable days, turnover slows, falling revenue, and accounts receivable collection timeframes increasing.
Conclusion
When it comes to working capital, it requires analysis as to why a company’s working capital level is at the level it is. Taking the level at face value doesn’t give the evaluator the full picture.
Dissecting Working Capital
July 1, 2025 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 4 min read
Working capital is the difference between a business’ current assets and liabilities. Negative working capital can happen when a business’ current assets are below its current liabilities. Therefore, working Capital = Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable. It’s a way to measure a company’s ability to meet short-term liabilities, such as managing inventory, satisfying vendor bills, etc., and how well its longer-term investments are implemented.
When a business has a surplus of current assets against its current liabilities, it’s said to have positive working capital. Generally speaking, when it’s positive, the business is able to service liabilities over the next 12 months, putting it in a good financial position. However, it’s important to understand how positive working capital is comprised. If a business has a sizeable outstanding accounts receivable account or has too much inventory, the company’s resources are not utilized efficiently. With money tied up in such areas and not financed by short-term liabilities, but with long-term capital, the long-term capital can’t be used for long-term investments.
When working capital is either even or negative, it’s a way to gauge how (in)efficiently a business handles near-term financial obligations. Reasons why negative working capital exists include a business making one-time cash payments due to a business’ current assets markedly dropping. Similarly, current liabilities can increase massively with more accounts payable and increasing credit.
Delving into Negative Working Capital
When analyzing negative working capital, it’s important to see how it’s connected to the current ratio. The current ratio is a business’ current assets divided by its current liabilities. When the current ratio’s calculation is less than 1.0, the business has more current liabilities than current assets, resulting in negative working capital.
Temporary negative working capital may exist when a company spends excessively or sees a steep increase in outstanding bills due to buying input materials and services from its suppliers. Though extended periods of negative working capital could be a red flag because the business might have a problem paying immediate bills and is being forced to depend on financing or raising funds via equity issuances to manage its working capital, it gives insight into the company’s financial barometer.
Negative Working Capital Requires Judgment
Depending on the type of business and its working capital levels, a negative working capital figure may or may not indicate there’s a concern. Retail, grocery, and subscription negative working capital may not be bad; however, for capital-intensive companies, negative working capital might indicate trouble. One way to measure working-level capital is through the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC). The CCC determines whether negative working capital is from efficient operations or cash flow constraints.
It looks at:
1. Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) or how long the inventory waits before a sale is made.
2. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) or how long before an invoice is paid to the company.
3. Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) or how many days it takes a company to pay its vendors’ invoices.
Where: CCC = DIO + DSO – DPO
If the resulting number from the CCC is negative, it indicates the company is receiving payments from its customers well before it needs to pay vendors/suppliers. A company with this type of result is in good shape financially. However, if the CCC is positive and meets some of the criteria, it would require further investigation to see if the negative working capital is worrisome. Examples of a company’s poor operation include higher accounts payable days, turnover slows, falling revenue, and accounts receivable collection timeframes increasing.
Conclusion
When it comes to working capital, it requires analysis as to why a company’s working capital level is at the level it is. Taking the level at face value doesn’t give the evaluator the full picture.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
The goodwill to assets ratio measures how much of a company’s total assets come from goodwill – an intangible asset like brand value or customer loyalty – and it plays a role in assessing the company’s overall value. It provides a ratio or percentage of the amount of intangible versus tangible assets. Understanding what the ratio represents, how it is calculated, and how to interpret it is essential for effectively applying it to business operations and investment decisions.
Goodwill Defined
Goodwill can be defined as an intangible asset that comes about when the acquiring firm obtains such assets from the acquired firm at a higher value. When it comes to accounting standards, both International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), intangible assets must be evaluated for impairment, but don’t need to be amortized. Based upon IFRS 38, goodwill is generated solely during an acquisition and is defined as the amount of the acquisition price for the acquired company over its book value. IFRS 38 does not recognize goodwill generated by the company internally.
Calculating Goodwill
Goodwill = Liabilities – Assets + Purchase Price
If a company looks at acquiring another company for $750,000, and the company being acquired has assets of $900,000 and liabilities of $450,000, the net assets would be $450,000. Based on the goodwill formula:
Once the goodwill has been established, the Goodwill to Assets Ratio Formula is used as follows:
Goodwill to Assets Ratio = Unamortized Goodwill / Total Assets
If one company is putting itself up for sale with a selling price of $75 million, it would have to establish its book value, based on recent financial statements, along with its goodwill value. Factors that go into calculating a company’s goodwill include if the company has prime real estate, a well-known brand, a rich list of clients, or intellectual property that sets itself apart from competitors in the industry that won’t expire for years. For example, if its intangible assets are $15 million, subtracted from its selling price of $75 million, its tangible assets or book value would be $60 million.
Based on the ratio, it’s calculated as follows:
$15 million / $75 million = 20 percent
Therefore, the ratio is 20 percent for the company’s goodwill as part of the company’s valuation. Otherwise, if the purchase goes through, whoever buys the company spends 20 percent on the company’s goodwill.
Analyzing the Goodwill to Assets Ratio
This ratio gives an overview of a business’s financial health. The lower the ratio, the more tangible or physical assets that can be sold. Conversely, the higher the ratio, the fewer intangibles a company has. Much like assets that can be written down, so can a company’s goodwill.
This ratio is not one-in-all and should be measured against businesses within the same industry. Based on this analysis, if a company has a large amount of goodwill on its financial statements, if it’s written down, it could still result in a lower valuation despite the company having a large amount of assets.
Looking over time, it shows the importance of ongoing evaluations. In 1975, according to the University of California, Los Angeles, companies on the Standard and Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) had $122 billion of intangible assets and $594 billion of tangible assets, or about a 21 percent intangible to tangible assets ratio. These companies included most industrial and energy sector names like GE, Procter & Gamble, 3M, Exxon Mobil, along with IBM, based on market capitalization. However, in 2018, the ratio increased to 84 percent of intangible to tangible assets. Intangible assets accounted for $21.03 trillion and $4 trillion when looking at most of the companies on the S&P 500, which included Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook, based on market capitalization.
While the growth of technology and communication services has risen and skewed the tangible to intangible ratio, it shows the importance of evaluating companies and sectors individually, not just with a broad brush.
The goodwill to assets ratio measures how much of a company’s total assets come from goodwill – an intangible asset like brand value or customer loyalty – and it plays a role in assessing the company’s overall value. It provides a ratio or percentage of the amount of intangible versus tangible assets. Understanding what the ratio represents, how it is calculated, and how to interpret it is essential for effectively applying it to business operations and investment decisions.
Goodwill Defined
Goodwill can be defined as an intangible asset that comes about when the acquiring firm obtains such assets from the acquired firm at a higher value. When it comes to accounting standards, both International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), intangible assets must be evaluated for impairment, but don’t need to be amortized. Based upon IFRS 38, goodwill is generated solely during an acquisition and is defined as the amount of the acquisition price for the acquired company over its book value. IFRS 38 does not recognize goodwill generated by the company internally.
Calculating Goodwill
Goodwill = Liabilities – Assets + Purchase Price
If a company looks at acquiring another company for $750,000, and the company being acquired has assets of $900,000 and liabilities of $450,000, the net assets would be $450,000. Based on the goodwill formula:
Once the goodwill has been established, the Goodwill to Assets Ratio Formula is used as follows:
Goodwill to Assets Ratio = Unamortized Goodwill / Total Assets
If one company is putting itself up for sale with a selling price of $75 million, it would have to establish its book value, based on recent financial statements, along with its goodwill value. Factors that go into calculating a company’s goodwill include if the company has prime real estate, a well-known brand, a rich list of clients, or intellectual property that sets itself apart from competitors in the industry that won’t expire for years. For example, if its intangible assets are $15 million, subtracted from its selling price of $75 million, its tangible assets or book value would be $60 million.
Based on the ratio, it’s calculated as follows:
$15 million / $75 million = 20 percent
Therefore, the ratio is 20 percent for the company’s goodwill as part of the company’s valuation. Otherwise, if the purchase goes through, whoever buys the company spends 20 percent on the company’s goodwill.
Analyzing the Goodwill to Assets Ratio
This ratio gives an overview of a business’s financial health. The lower the ratio, the more tangible or physical assets that can be sold. Conversely, the higher the ratio, the fewer intangibles a company has. Much like assets that can be written down, so can a company’s goodwill.
This ratio is not one-in-all and should be measured against businesses within the same industry. Based on this analysis, if a company has a large amount of goodwill on its financial statements, if it’s written down, it could still result in a lower valuation despite the company having a large amount of assets.
Looking over time, it shows the importance of ongoing evaluations. In 1975, according to the University of California, Los Angeles, companies on the Standard and Poor’s 500 (S&P 500) had $122 billion of intangible assets and $594 billion of tangible assets, or about a 21 percent intangible to tangible assets ratio. These companies included most industrial and energy sector names like GE, Procter & Gamble, 3M, Exxon Mobil, along with IBM, based on market capitalization. However, in 2018, the ratio increased to 84 percent of intangible to tangible assets. Intangible assets accounted for $21.03 trillion and $4 trillion when looking at most of the companies on the S&P 500, which included Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook, based on market capitalization.
While the growth of technology and communication services has risen and skewed the tangible to intangible ratio, it shows the importance of evaluating companies and sectors individually, not just with a broad brush.
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Lately, there has been a lot of talk about quantum computing, drawing interest from many, including business leaders. Quantum computing promises to solve previously unsolvable problems and revolutionize entire industries. As a result, excitement around its potential is rapidly growing. However, it is important to first ask where the hype ends and the real business value begins.
What is Quantum Computing?
Simply put, quantum computing is a new way of processing information. Unlike classical computers that use bits that are either 0 or 1, quantum computers use qubits (quantum bits). Qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously as enabled by the principles of superposition and entanglement. This allows quantum computers to process vast amounts of information in parallel. Hence, quantum computers can theoretically tackle certain classes of problems that would take classical computers years to solve.
The Hype: Quantum’s Promised Revolution
Quantum computing is said to have the potential to perform tasks such as cracking encryption, revolutionizing drug discovery, optimizing global supply, and transforming artificial intelligence. Forecasts like one from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) project that quantum computing could unlock up to $850 billion in economic value by 2040. As a result, major industries are investing heavily and hoping to be among the first to benefit from a potential industrial revolution.
The Reality: Technical and Practical Challenges
The reality tells a different story. Today’s quantum hardware is still in its infancy, with most of these computers having fewer than 100 reliable qubits. They face issues such as noise and error rates that make large-scale practical applications elusive. Unlike classic chips that can be stacked for scaling needs, quantum systems can’t be easily scaled and need major advances in architecture and interconnects. Specialized expertise is also required to develop software for quantum machines. Besides, the algorithms that fully exploit the quantum advantage are still being researched. McKinsey estimates that while there may be many operational quantum computers by 2030, their ability to solve complex problems will take more time to mature.
This isn’t to say there is no hope as more improvement is made to quantum computing every day. Consider Google’s Willow, a 105-qubit processor introduced in December 2024. Willow addresses the error correction challenge and performs certain computations in under five minutes, which would take a supercomputer 10 septillion years.
Real-World Business Applications
Despite these challenges, quantum computing has demonstrated potential in real-world use cases. One example is Volkswagen who partnered with quantum computing firms to optimize traffic flow in Lisbon. This demonstrated how quantum algorithms can improve urban mobility. In finance, quantum-inspired algorithms are being tested for portfolio optimization and risk analysis by companies like JPMorgan Chase. Pharmaceutical companies are also testing molecular interactions with quantum simulation to potentially accelerate drug discovery. It’s worth noting that these applications are mainly hybrid solutions that use both quantum and classical computing. Even so, it signals there is potential in future breakthroughs.
Cloud-based quantum computing availed by platforms like IBM, Microsoft and Google have greatly contributed to this venture. These resources have made experimentation possible without the need for in-house quantum hardware. Therefore, businesses have a chance to innovate solutions to complex problems more affordably.
An example of a strategic framework that can help business leaders is the “quantum economic advantage” developed by MIT and Accenture. It requires two conditions: a quantum computer capable of handling the problem’s size (feasibility) and a quantum algorithm that outperforms a similarly priced classical solution (algorithmic advantage). Only when both conditions are met does quantum computing become economically beneficial.
How Businesses Should Get Ready for Quantum Computing
Preparing for quantum computing doesn’t require immediate transformation; however, it does call for strategic foresight. Here’s how businesses can begin laying the groundwork today.
Create a Quantum Strategy: Identify potential long-term use cases where quantum could offer an edge, and develop a roadmap aligned with industry trends and business goals.
Invest in Collaboration and Research: Partner with universities, quantum startups, and industry groups to stay updated and explore early-stage innovations.
Start Quantum-Proofing Security: Begin evaluating quantum-resistant encryption methods to safeguard future data as quantum threats to cybersecurity emerge.
Experiment Safely: Use cloud-based quantum platforms to run small pilots or simulations, gaining hands-on experience without major commitments.
Build Internal Capability: Upskill current staff in foundational quantum concepts to ensure your team can engage with this evolving technology when the time is right.
Final Thoughts
Quantum computing is in its early stages, but its disruptive potential and rapid development give businesses a reason to start planning on its adoption, or risk falling behind. Integrating quantum has the potential to boost efficiency, cut costs, and enable innovative products and services. To stay competitive, businesses should start building a quantum-ready workforce through training, hiring, and academic partnerships.
Quantum Computing: Separating Hype from Real-World Business Value
June 1, 2025 · Blog, What's New in Technology
⏱ 4 min read
Lately, there has been a lot of talk about quantum computing, drawing interest from many, including business leaders. Quantum computing promises to solve previously unsolvable problems and revolutionize entire industries. As a result, excitement around its potential is rapidly growing. However, it is important to first ask where the hype ends and the real business value begins.
What is Quantum Computing?
Simply put, quantum computing is a new way of processing information. Unlike classical computers that use bits that are either 0 or 1, quantum computers use qubits (quantum bits). Qubits can exist in multiple states simultaneously as enabled by the principles of superposition and entanglement. This allows quantum computers to process vast amounts of information in parallel. Hence, quantum computers can theoretically tackle certain classes of problems that would take classical computers years to solve.
The Hype: Quantum’s Promised Revolution
Quantum computing is said to have the potential to perform tasks such as cracking encryption, revolutionizing drug discovery, optimizing global supply, and transforming artificial intelligence. Forecasts like one from Boston Consulting Group (BCG) project that quantum computing could unlock up to $850 billion in economic value by 2040. As a result, major industries are investing heavily and hoping to be among the first to benefit from a potential industrial revolution.
The Reality: Technical and Practical Challenges
The reality tells a different story. Today’s quantum hardware is still in its infancy, with most of these computers having fewer than 100 reliable qubits. They face issues such as noise and error rates that make large-scale practical applications elusive. Unlike classic chips that can be stacked for scaling needs, quantum systems can’t be easily scaled and need major advances in architecture and interconnects. Specialized expertise is also required to develop software for quantum machines. Besides, the algorithms that fully exploit the quantum advantage are still being researched. McKinsey estimates that while there may be many operational quantum computers by 2030, their ability to solve complex problems will take more time to mature.
This isn’t to say there is no hope as more improvement is made to quantum computing every day. Consider Google’s Willow, a 105-qubit processor introduced in December 2024. Willow addresses the error correction challenge and performs certain computations in under five minutes, which would take a supercomputer 10 septillion years.
Real-World Business Applications
Despite these challenges, quantum computing has demonstrated potential in real-world use cases. One example is Volkswagen who partnered with quantum computing firms to optimize traffic flow in Lisbon. This demonstrated how quantum algorithms can improve urban mobility. In finance, quantum-inspired algorithms are being tested for portfolio optimization and risk analysis by companies like JPMorgan Chase. Pharmaceutical companies are also testing molecular interactions with quantum simulation to potentially accelerate drug discovery. It’s worth noting that these applications are mainly hybrid solutions that use both quantum and classical computing. Even so, it signals there is potential in future breakthroughs.
Cloud-based quantum computing availed by platforms like IBM, Microsoft and Google have greatly contributed to this venture. These resources have made experimentation possible without the need for in-house quantum hardware. Therefore, businesses have a chance to innovate solutions to complex problems more affordably.
An example of a strategic framework that can help business leaders is the “quantum economic advantage” developed by MIT and Accenture. It requires two conditions: a quantum computer capable of handling the problem’s size (feasibility) and a quantum algorithm that outperforms a similarly priced classical solution (algorithmic advantage). Only when both conditions are met does quantum computing become economically beneficial.
How Businesses Should Get Ready for Quantum Computing
Preparing for quantum computing doesn’t require immediate transformation; however, it does call for strategic foresight. Here’s how businesses can begin laying the groundwork today.
Create a Quantum Strategy: Identify potential long-term use cases where quantum could offer an edge, and develop a roadmap aligned with industry trends and business goals.
Invest in Collaboration and Research: Partner with universities, quantum startups, and industry groups to stay updated and explore early-stage innovations.
Start Quantum-Proofing Security: Begin evaluating quantum-resistant encryption methods to safeguard future data as quantum threats to cybersecurity emerge.
Experiment Safely: Use cloud-based quantum platforms to run small pilots or simulations, gaining hands-on experience without major commitments.
Build Internal Capability: Upskill current staff in foundational quantum concepts to ensure your team can engage with this evolving technology when the time is right.
Final Thoughts
Quantum computing is in its early stages, but its disruptive potential and rapid development give businesses a reason to start planning on its adoption, or risk falling behind. Integrating quantum has the potential to boost efficiency, cut costs, and enable innovative products and services. To stay competitive, businesses should start building a quantum-ready workforce through training, hiring, and academic partnerships.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.