Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is one way to help advertising and marketing professionals and investors analyze how well promotions do (or don’t) produce sales. It helps advertisers develop data based on their campaigns’ revenue production (or lack thereof). Understanding how this metric is calculated and how to analyze ROAS is essential for businesses to monitor and increase their advertising performance.
Known as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI), ROAS determines how much sales are generated per dollar invested on advertising outlays. It separates advertising costs from the company’s costs, and it focuses on:
1. The differences between advertising income and advertisement expenses
2. Assisting companies with creating efficient budgets
3. Identifying unprofitable campaigns
How ROAS is calculated:
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) = Revenue generated from ad campaign/Total advertising costs for a specific campaign
The revenue generated from an ad campaign is the revenue immediately assignable to promotions utilizing a tracking tool.
Total advertising costs for a specific campaign are expenses explicitly connected to the advertising platform.
The resulting calculation determines the business’ return on ad spend, giving owners and managers an idea of how well (or not) ad spending impacts the company’s sales. It similarly enables business owners to reconcile the company’s budgeted advertising costs against growing sales metrics. The following hypothetical breakdown shows what a positive scenario looks like:
A ROAS of 10 = $10 of revenue was earned for every $1 spent on ads. This would translate into:
Total Ad Spend: $10,000
Revenue Generated: $100,000
ROAS = $10
ROAS = 10:1
Important considerations when calculating this include factoring in merchant expenses, costs for digital content production, and costs incurred from media platforms. It’s also important to consider that it’s not always cut-and-dry as to how and what specific ads convert potential customers into paying customers. Assigning the exact ad platform or campaign is a common problem when determining the exact ROAS.
Credit analysis conducted by lenders evaluates ROAS to determine the sales ability of companies seeking loans, especially with promotion-centric companies. The higher the ROAS, the less risk there is and the more reliable the revenue from each campaign. For merger and acquisition professionals, ROAS trends offer insight into a target company’s sustainability. It helps determine if a company’s advertising campaigns can sustain themselves and keep generating future growth.
It’s equally important to see how ROAS compares against other metrics. While ROAS focuses on revenue generated per dollar spent, the advertising-to-sales ratio looks at the total proportion of sales driven by advertising efforts. Similarly, while ROAS measures the revenue per ad spend, return on investment analyzes the comprehensive profitability for the complete level of marketing expenses – not exclusively advertising. While ROAS is a short-term measure on instant sales, Lifetime Value looks at the customer’s history with the company and the entire revenue the company earns from the relationship.
While this metric is helpful for many professionals, it’s important to ensure that only necessary data is included and customer conversion is monitored precisely in order to get the best output.
Analyzing Return on Ad Spending
February 1, 2025 · Blog, General Business News
⏱ 3 min read
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) is one way to help advertising and marketing professionals and investors analyze how well promotions do (or don’t) produce sales. It helps advertisers develop data based on their campaigns’ revenue production (or lack thereof). Understanding how this metric is calculated and how to analyze ROAS is essential for businesses to monitor and increase their advertising performance.
Known as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI), ROAS determines how much sales are generated per dollar invested on advertising outlays. It separates advertising costs from the company’s costs, and it focuses on:
1. The differences between advertising income and advertisement expenses
2. Assisting companies with creating efficient budgets
3. Identifying unprofitable campaigns
How ROAS is calculated:
Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) = Revenue generated from ad campaign/Total advertising costs for a specific campaign
The revenue generated from an ad campaign is the revenue immediately assignable to promotions utilizing a tracking tool.
Total advertising costs for a specific campaign are expenses explicitly connected to the advertising platform.
The resulting calculation determines the business’ return on ad spend, giving owners and managers an idea of how well (or not) ad spending impacts the company’s sales. It similarly enables business owners to reconcile the company’s budgeted advertising costs against growing sales metrics. The following hypothetical breakdown shows what a positive scenario looks like:
A ROAS of 10 = $10 of revenue was earned for every $1 spent on ads. This would translate into:
Total Ad Spend: $10,000
Revenue Generated: $100,000
ROAS = $10
ROAS = 10:1
Important considerations when calculating this include factoring in merchant expenses, costs for digital content production, and costs incurred from media platforms. It’s also important to consider that it’s not always cut-and-dry as to how and what specific ads convert potential customers into paying customers. Assigning the exact ad platform or campaign is a common problem when determining the exact ROAS.
Credit analysis conducted by lenders evaluates ROAS to determine the sales ability of companies seeking loans, especially with promotion-centric companies. The higher the ROAS, the less risk there is and the more reliable the revenue from each campaign. For merger and acquisition professionals, ROAS trends offer insight into a target company’s sustainability. It helps determine if a company’s advertising campaigns can sustain themselves and keep generating future growth.
It’s equally important to see how ROAS compares against other metrics. While ROAS focuses on revenue generated per dollar spent, the advertising-to-sales ratio looks at the total proportion of sales driven by advertising efforts. Similarly, while ROAS measures the revenue per ad spend, return on investment analyzes the comprehensive profitability for the complete level of marketing expenses – not exclusively advertising. While ROAS is a short-term measure on instant sales, Lifetime Value looks at the customer’s history with the company and the entire revenue the company earns from the relationship.
While this metric is helpful for many professionals, it’s important to ensure that only necessary data is included and customer conversion is monitored precisely in order to get the best output.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.
Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.
Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.
POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.
Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.
MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.
Beefing Up Laws for Illegal Immigrants and Preparing for Future Disasters
February 1, 2025 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 3 min read
Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.
Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.
Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.
POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.
Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.
MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.
Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
The word “innocent” in innocent spouse relief can be misleading. It doesn’t imply you’re perfect or blameless – it’s more about whether you knew or should have known about the tax issue. The IRS defines “innocence” in a specific way, and it hinges on the concept of reasonable ignorance. In short, the issue isn’t one of morality; it’s about whether you could have reasonably been unaware of a tax problem.
Innocent spouse relief allows you to avoid being held responsible for tax debts, penalties, and interest stemming from a joint tax filing. In the case that a spouse (or ex-spouse) made an error that led to a tax issue, regardless of intention, you may not have to shoulder the burden. Say your income wasn’t reported, excessive deductions were claimed, or tax fraud was committed. If you meet the IRS criteria, you can request relief by submitting Form 8857.
Qualifications for Innocent Spouse Relief
To qualify, you must meet several conditions.
Joint Tax Return: The tax liability must arise from a joint return. When you file together, both spouses are equally responsible for any tax issues that arise.
Tax Underreporting: The tax issue must stem from underreported income or an incorrect claim for deductions or credits. This could involve unreported income (like from offshore accounts) or fraudulent deductions made by your spouse.
Lack of Knowledge: You must show that, at the time of filing, you were unaware of the problem and had no reason to suspect it.
Unfair Responsibility: Lastly, it must be deemed unjust to hold you liable. The IRS looks at factors such as whether you benefited from the underreported taxes (e.g., through extravagant spending) or if you’ve divorced.
What Doesn’t Qualify for Innocent Spouse Relief?
Not all cases involving a spouse’s financial mismanagement qualify for relief. The IRS may reject your claim in the following situations:
Awareness of the Mistake: If you knew about the issue or should have known, you won’t be eligible for relief. Simply stating that you didn’t read the return won’t suffice. The IRS expects you to recognize obvious errors if you have access to the relevant information.
Divorce Doesn’t Automatically Provide Relief: Divorce alone doesn’t eliminate your liability for tax debt. Joint returns create shared responsibility, and being separated or divorced doesn’t mean the IRS will automatically release you from this obligation. You must prove your innocence through the relief process.
Disagreements Over Personal Spending: If your spouse’s spending decisions are something you disagree with, the IRS will not consider it a tax issue unless it involves unreported income or fraudulent deductions. The IRS focuses on tax matters, not marital conflicts over financial choices.
Pros and Cons of Filing
Advantages include:
Avoid Financial Hardship: Tax liabilities, along with interest and penalties, can be overwhelming. Innocent spouse relief can protect you from these financial burdens.
Clear Your Name: If you’ve been unfairly tied to a tax issue you didn’t cause, the relief process can help remove you from the responsibility.
Peace of Mind: Successfully claiming relief can bring emotional relief, especially if you’ve gone through a challenging marriage.
Potential drawbacks are:
No Guarantee of Approval: The IRS does not grant relief easily. You’ll need to provide strong evidence, and the process can be lengthy and difficult.
Time Limitations: You generally must apply for relief within two years of the IRS starting collection efforts. Missing this deadline could result in losing the opportunity for relief.
Invasive Process: The IRS will closely examine your financial and personal life, including details about your marriage and finances, which could feel intrusive if you value your privacy.
Possible Strain on Relationships: If you’re still married, filing for relief could cause tension, as it might be seen as blaming your spouse for the tax issue.
Conclusion
To request innocent spouse relief, you’ll need to file Form 8857. Be prepared to provide details about the tax years involved, explain why you didn’t know about the issue, and any supporting documents (like bank statements, emails, or divorce decrees.
After submitting the form, the IRS will notify your spouse or ex-spouse, who will have a chance to respond by a specific date.
What is Innocent Spouse Relief?
The word “innocent” in innocent spouse relief can be misleading. It doesn’t imply you’re perfect or blameless – it’s more about whether you knew or should have known about the tax issue. The IRS defines “innocence” in a specific way, and it hinges on the concept of reasonable ignorance. In short, the issue isn’t one of morality; it’s about whether you could have reasonably been unaware of a tax problem.Innocent spouse relief allows you to avoid being held responsible for tax debts, penalties, and interest stemming from a joint tax filing.
What is Innocent Spouse Relief?
January 1, 2025 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 5 min read
The word “innocent” in innocent spouse relief can be misleading. It doesn’t imply you’re perfect or blameless – it’s more about whether you knew or should have known about the tax issue. The IRS defines “innocence” in a specific way, and it hinges on the concept of reasonable ignorance. In short, the issue isn’t one of morality; it’s about whether you could have reasonably been unaware of a tax problem.
Innocent spouse relief allows you to avoid being held responsible for tax debts, penalties, and interest stemming from a joint tax filing. In the case that a spouse (or ex-spouse) made an error that led to a tax issue, regardless of intention, you may not have to shoulder the burden. Say your income wasn’t reported, excessive deductions were claimed, or tax fraud was committed. If you meet the IRS criteria, you can request relief by submitting Form 8857.
Qualifications for Innocent Spouse Relief
To qualify, you must meet several conditions.
Joint Tax Return: The tax liability must arise from a joint return. When you file together, both spouses are equally responsible for any tax issues that arise.
Tax Underreporting: The tax issue must stem from underreported income or an incorrect claim for deductions or credits. This could involve unreported income (like from offshore accounts) or fraudulent deductions made by your spouse.
Lack of Knowledge: You must show that, at the time of filing, you were unaware of the problem and had no reason to suspect it.
Unfair Responsibility: Lastly, it must be deemed unjust to hold you liable. The IRS looks at factors such as whether you benefited from the underreported taxes (e.g., through extravagant spending) or if you’ve divorced.
What Doesn’t Qualify for Innocent Spouse Relief?
Not all cases involving a spouse’s financial mismanagement qualify for relief. The IRS may reject your claim in the following situations:
Awareness of the Mistake: If you knew about the issue or should have known, you won’t be eligible for relief. Simply stating that you didn’t read the return won’t suffice. The IRS expects you to recognize obvious errors if you have access to the relevant information.
Divorce Doesn’t Automatically Provide Relief: Divorce alone doesn’t eliminate your liability for tax debt. Joint returns create shared responsibility, and being separated or divorced doesn’t mean the IRS will automatically release you from this obligation. You must prove your innocence through the relief process.
Disagreements Over Personal Spending: If your spouse’s spending decisions are something you disagree with, the IRS will not consider it a tax issue unless it involves unreported income or fraudulent deductions. The IRS focuses on tax matters, not marital conflicts over financial choices.
Pros and Cons of Filing
Advantages include:
Avoid Financial Hardship: Tax liabilities, along with interest and penalties, can be overwhelming. Innocent spouse relief can protect you from these financial burdens.
Clear Your Name: If you’ve been unfairly tied to a tax issue you didn’t cause, the relief process can help remove you from the responsibility.
Peace of Mind: Successfully claiming relief can bring emotional relief, especially if you’ve gone through a challenging marriage.
Potential drawbacks are:
No Guarantee of Approval: The IRS does not grant relief easily. You’ll need to provide strong evidence, and the process can be lengthy and difficult.
Time Limitations: You generally must apply for relief within two years of the IRS starting collection efforts. Missing this deadline could result in losing the opportunity for relief.
Invasive Process: The IRS will closely examine your financial and personal life, including details about your marriage and finances, which could feel intrusive if you value your privacy.
Possible Strain on Relationships: If you’re still married, filing for relief could cause tension, as it might be seen as blaming your spouse for the tax issue.
Conclusion
To request innocent spouse relief, you’ll need to file Form 8857. Be prepared to provide details about the tax years involved, explain why you didn’t know about the issue, and any supporting documents (like bank statements, emails, or divorce decrees.
After submitting the form, the IRS will notify your spouse or ex-spouse, who will have a chance to respond by a specific date.
What is Innocent Spouse Relief?
The word “innocent” in innocent spouse relief can be misleading. It doesn’t imply you’re perfect or blameless – it’s more about whether you knew or should have known about the tax issue. The IRS defines “innocence” in a specific way, and it hinges on the concept of reasonable ignorance. In short, the issue isn’t one of morality; it’s about whether you could have reasonably been unaware of a tax problem.Innocent spouse relief allows you to avoid being held responsible for tax debts, penalties, and interest stemming from a joint tax filing.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Here we are in yet another new year. The obligations and celebrations are over. Chances are, you’ve spent a fair amount over the holidays and might need a plan to help kickstart 2025 with some actionable financial goals. Here are a few ideas.
Create a Budget
This one never gets old. Why? It’s one of the keys to successful budgeting. You can set up a budget for the year that includes essentials, entertainment, and nice-to-haves, aka your Wish Farm. Then place it in your planner or app – there are many good ones out there. In fact, there’s a TikTok trend called loud budgeting, where people openly discuss their financial goals on social media – why they do or don’t want to buy something. If this is your thing and it helps you stay on track, go for it! If not, a good old-fashioned planner works just as well.
Bucket Your Money
This is the next step after the aforementioned. Split your money into categories: food, rent/ mortgage, utilities, medical, entertainment, vacation, etc. Apps can help you parse out these groups. You might also set up separate banking accounts for some of the necessities so you’ll know to leave them alone and not dip into them, tempting as it may be.
Set Up Auto-Drafts
Let’s say you’re saving for your child’s college fund or a down payment on a car. When you create an auto-draft for a certain amount, you’ll never miss that deposit. If you need to tweak the amount during the year, do it. Here’s the bottom line: 1) You’ll learn to live on less, and 2) you’ll be on the way to making your dreams come true.
Look for Savings Deals
Don’t just settle for the interest rate your current bank is offering. There are many options out there to grow your money. But first, do you want to lock into a fixed rate? This can be useful for long-term goals, such as buying a property. Or do you want an easy-to-access account with the ability to withdraw cash for emergencies or short-term needs like birthday or wedding gifts? Shop around.
Cancel Seldom-Used Subscriptions
Scour your bank statement. Do you need all those online magazine subscriptions? How about newsletters you pay for – the ones you rarely read? Purge your subscriptions, then see how much you’ll save. If you’re so inclined, you could put these dollars toward a gym membership. January is when all the specials appear: zero joining fees, if not a seriously cut rate.
Start a Savings Challenge
Try putting away a small amount every month. Get in the habit of emptying your pockets or coin purse. Safeguard your coins in a mason jar, and then transfer them monthly into your savings account. The next month, increase how much you contribute. Pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters add up! After a year, you might be surprised how much you’ve saved.
Decide on Goals
These can be small or large. It’s up to you. Spend some time thinking about what’s important. Do you want to remodel your house? Contribute to a beloved charity or cause? One resource you might want to consider setting up is an emergency spending pot. This is essential and sometimes overlooked. Regardless of what you decide, figure out your parameters: how much to set aside, how often, and by when. Having financial targets gives you something to look forward to. Best of all, when you achieve your goal, it’s an awesome feeling.
More often than not, New Year’s resolutions center on getting physically fit. But if you stay the course with your finances, you’ll most definitely be, wait for it … fiscally fit!
Sources
10 things you can do right now to start 2025 with fresh finances
Here we are in yet another new year. The obligations and celebrations are over. Chances are, you’ve spent a fair amount over the holidays and might need a plan to help kickstart 2025 with some actionable financial goals. Here are a few ideas.
Create a Budget
This one never gets old. Why? It’s one of the keys to successful budgeting. You can set up a budget for the year that includes essentials, entertainment, and nice-to-haves, aka your Wish Farm. Then place it in your planner or app – there are many good ones out there. In fact, there’s a TikTok trend called loud budgeting, where people openly discuss their financial goals on social media – why they do or don’t want to buy something. If this is your thing and it helps you stay on track, go for it! If not, a good old-fashioned planner works just as well.
Bucket Your Money
This is the next step after the aforementioned. Split your money into categories: food, rent/ mortgage, utilities, medical, entertainment, vacation, etc. Apps can help you parse out these groups. You might also set up separate banking accounts for some of the necessities so you’ll know to leave them alone and not dip into them, tempting as it may be.
Set Up Auto-Drafts
Let’s say you’re saving for your child’s college fund or a down payment on a car. When you create an auto-draft for a certain amount, you’ll never miss that deposit. If you need to tweak the amount during the year, do it. Here’s the bottom line: 1) You’ll learn to live on less, and 2) you’ll be on the way to making your dreams come true.
Look for Savings Deals
Don’t just settle for the interest rate your current bank is offering. There are many options out there to grow your money. But first, do you want to lock into a fixed rate? This can be useful for long-term goals, such as buying a property. Or do you want an easy-to-access account with the ability to withdraw cash for emergencies or short-term needs like birthday or wedding gifts? Shop around.
Cancel Seldom-Used Subscriptions
Scour your bank statement. Do you need all those online magazine subscriptions? How about newsletters you pay for – the ones you rarely read? Purge your subscriptions, then see how much you’ll save. If you’re so inclined, you could put these dollars toward a gym membership. January is when all the specials appear: zero joining fees, if not a seriously cut rate.
Start a Savings Challenge
Try putting away a small amount every month. Get in the habit of emptying your pockets or coin purse. Safeguard your coins in a mason jar, and then transfer them monthly into your savings account. The next month, increase how much you contribute. Pennies, nickels, dimes, and quarters add up! After a year, you might be surprised how much you’ve saved.
Decide on Goals
These can be small or large. It’s up to you. Spend some time thinking about what’s important. Do you want to remodel your house? Contribute to a beloved charity or cause? One resource you might want to consider setting up is an emergency spending pot. This is essential and sometimes overlooked. Regardless of what you decide, figure out your parameters: how much to set aside, how often, and by when. Having financial targets gives you something to look forward to. Best of all, when you achieve your goal, it’s an awesome feeling.
More often than not, New Year’s resolutions center on getting physically fit. But if you stay the course with your finances, you’ll most definitely be, wait for it … fiscally fit!
Sources
10 things you can do right now to start 2025 with fresh finances
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, formally known as H.R. 82, aimed at ending two provisions in the Social Security system that affect public sector employees who have earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. These provisions are the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, both of which reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for workers who have worked in both public-sector and private-sector jobs.
The Problem: WEP and GPO
The Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset were originally designed to prevent public sector workers from receiving larger Social Security benefits than they would have been entitled to had they worked in jobs covered by Social Security for their entire careers. However, critics argue that these provisions disproportionately harm workers who have spent a significant portion of their careers in public service, such as teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other state and local government employees.
Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):
The WEP reduces the Social Security benefits of individuals who have worked in both the private sector (where they paid into Social Security) and the public sector (where they often did not contribute to Social Security). Typically, Social Security benefits are based on an individual’s 35 highest-earning years. The WEP alters the formula used to calculate benefits for individuals with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings in Social Security-covered employment, leading to a lower Social Security benefit than they would otherwise be entitled to. For many, this results in a significant reduction in the monthly payment they would have received under the standard Social Security formula.
Government Pension Offset (GPO):
The GPO affects spouses and widows/widowers of Social Security beneficiaries. Under this provision, individuals who receive a government pension from work that was not covered by Social Security (such as state or local government employees) see a reduction in their spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security. The offset is calculated by reducing the spousal or survivor benefit by an amount equal to two-thirds of the government pension. This can leave many public employees with little to no spousal or survivor benefits despite their spouse having paid into Social Security.
What H.R. 82 Seeks to Accomplish
By eliminating both the WEP and GPO, the bill aims to ensure that public sector workers who have earned Social Security benefits through their work in the private sector are not penalized by reductions in those benefits. It also seeks to provide fairer treatment for the spouses and survivors of government employees who may otherwise see their Social Security benefits reduced or eliminated entirely.
The bill has garnered bipartisan support, as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognize the fairness of eliminating these provisions, which many see as an unjust penalty against those who have dedicated their careers to public service. H.R. 82, if passed, would provide much-needed relief to millions of retirees, many of who are struggling with the financial impacts of these provisions.
Conclusion:
The introduction of H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, marks a crucial point in the ongoing debate over Social Security benefits for public sector workers. By eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, the bill would restore fairness and equity for millions of public employees who have spent their careers in service to their communities. As this bill progresses, it will likely remain a significant issue in discussions surrounding Social Security reform and the treatment of public sector employees.
President Joe Biden signed H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act, into law on Sunday, January 5, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time Zone.
The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023: More Retirement Income for Teachers, Police, Firefighters & Gov. Workers
January 1, 2025 · Blog, Guest Article of the Month
⏱ 3 min read
The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, formally known as H.R. 82, aimed at ending two provisions in the Social Security system that affect public sector employees who have earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. These provisions are the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, both of which reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for workers who have worked in both public-sector and private-sector jobs.
The Problem: WEP and GPO
The Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset were originally designed to prevent public sector workers from receiving larger Social Security benefits than they would have been entitled to had they worked in jobs covered by Social Security for their entire careers. However, critics argue that these provisions disproportionately harm workers who have spent a significant portion of their careers in public service, such as teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other state and local government employees.
Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):
The WEP reduces the Social Security benefits of individuals who have worked in both the private sector (where they paid into Social Security) and the public sector (where they often did not contribute to Social Security). Typically, Social Security benefits are based on an individual’s 35 highest-earning years. The WEP alters the formula used to calculate benefits for individuals with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings in Social Security-covered employment, leading to a lower Social Security benefit than they would otherwise be entitled to. For many, this results in a significant reduction in the monthly payment they would have received under the standard Social Security formula.
Government Pension Offset (GPO):
The GPO affects spouses and widows/widowers of Social Security beneficiaries. Under this provision, individuals who receive a government pension from work that was not covered by Social Security (such as state or local government employees) see a reduction in their spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security. The offset is calculated by reducing the spousal or survivor benefit by an amount equal to two-thirds of the government pension. This can leave many public employees with little to no spousal or survivor benefits despite their spouse having paid into Social Security.
What H.R. 82 Seeks to Accomplish
By eliminating both the WEP and GPO, the bill aims to ensure that public sector workers who have earned Social Security benefits through their work in the private sector are not penalized by reductions in those benefits. It also seeks to provide fairer treatment for the spouses and survivors of government employees who may otherwise see their Social Security benefits reduced or eliminated entirely.
The bill has garnered bipartisan support, as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognize the fairness of eliminating these provisions, which many see as an unjust penalty against those who have dedicated their careers to public service. H.R. 82, if passed, would provide much-needed relief to millions of retirees, many of who are struggling with the financial impacts of these provisions.
Conclusion:
The introduction of H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, marks a crucial point in the ongoing debate over Social Security benefits for public sector workers. By eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, the bill would restore fairness and equity for millions of public employees who have spent their careers in service to their communities. As this bill progresses, it will likely remain a significant issue in discussions surrounding Social Security reform and the treatment of public sector employees.
President Joe Biden signed H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act, into law on Sunday, January 5, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time Zone.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.