Be it an internal or external valuation, there’s a bevy of options to value a business with ratios. Examples include price-to-earnings, price-to-sales or EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization).
⏱ 3 min read
Be it an internal or external valuation, there’s a bevy of options to value a business with ratios. Examples include price-to-earnings, price-to-sales or EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization). Along with these available valuation options, another valuation option is the Q Ratio.
This metric compares a tangible asset’s market value against the same asset’s substitute values. This ratio, credited to inventor and Nobel laureate James Tobin, hypothesized that this valuation ratio can gauge whether a listed company’s overall equity market value should be approximately equivalent to a company’s asset replacement costs. This can be extrapolated to either one share of equity or the whole market.
The initial formula took the assets’ market value and divided it by the same assets’ replacement cost of capital.
However, it’s not always easy to approximate the total assets replacement costs. Therefore, assets book values are inserted in place of the assets replacement costs.
Consequently, the next iteration is:
Step 1: Add the Liabilities Market Value + Equity Market Value
Step 2: Divide the Sum of Step 1 by (Liabilities Market Value + Equity Book Value)
For the broad equity market:
= Equity Exchange Worth / Corporate Net Worth
Let’s look at how it’s calculated:
Company X’s 30 million shares are floating on public exchanges, priced at $15 per share. This equals the firm’s total market value. The firm has $450,000,000 in physical assets. The formula is as follows:
Q Ratio = (Total Market Value of Firm) divided by (Total Asset Value of Firm)
= $525,000,000 / $450,000,000
= 1.17
As the calculation says, this company’s market valuation is greater compared to the replacement cost. This shows the firm is likely to be overpriced and ripe for a possible takeover.
Interpreting Results
Utilized to calculate a company’s value, it’s important to understand how the resulting calculation works. If the resulting calculation is less than 1, a company’s booked assets hold more value than the value of its equity worth. An organization’s calculation under 1 implies that its market valuation is undervalued. It can be interpreted as a potential acquisition target by another company that can exploit its untapped value.
When a company’s Q ratio exceeds 1, its market value is greater than the book value (or replacement cost) of its assets. A high Q ratio often indicates that the market is placing value on unrecorded intangible assets – such as patents, brand equity or intellectual property – or expecting strong future growth, rather than simply meaning the company is overvalued. A ratio of more than 1 shows that a business’ earnings were greater compared to their assets replacement costs. This can be a sign that potential competitors may step in to create competition to garner a portion of the business’ profits.
When a company’s Q ratio is exactly 1, the company’s assets are said to be reasonably priced.
Considerations
Market speculation, along with intangible assets, there are two main sticking points when evaluating the resulting Q ratio. When analysts’ projections impact a business’ market valuation or price target, these market forecasts can’t necessarily be articulated via financial statement and accounting analysis. This can skew how the market values company equities. Market hype can’t be recorded in a company’s financial statements. Intangible assets or goodwill is the other component that cannot be fully valued – only estimated. The calculation must similarly be considered if a business holds extensive intellectual property, especially high-growth, technology-based companies.
While there are many ways to value a company or the entire equity market, understanding how this ratio is calculated is essential to being versatile with financial valuations.
Making the Most of the Q Ratio
November 1, 2026 · Blog, General Business News
⏱ 3 min read
Be it an internal or external valuation, there’s a bevy of options to value a business with ratios. Examples include price-to-earnings, price-to-sales or EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization). Along with these available valuation options, another valuation option is the Q Ratio.
This metric compares a tangible asset’s market value against the same asset’s substitute values. This ratio, credited to inventor and Nobel laureate James Tobin, hypothesized that this valuation ratio can gauge whether a listed company’s overall equity market value should be approximately equivalent to a company’s asset replacement costs. This can be extrapolated to either one share of equity or the whole market.
The initial formula took the assets’ market value and divided it by the same assets’ replacement cost of capital.
However, it’s not always easy to approximate the total assets replacement costs. Therefore, assets book values are inserted in place of the assets replacement costs.
Consequently, the next iteration is:
Step 1: Add the Liabilities Market Value + Equity Market Value
Step 2: Divide the Sum of Step 1 by (Liabilities Market Value + Equity Book Value)
For the broad equity market:
= Equity Exchange Worth / Corporate Net Worth
Let’s look at how it’s calculated:
Company X’s 30 million shares are floating on public exchanges, priced at $15 per share. This equals the firm’s total market value. The firm has $450,000,000 in physical assets. The formula is as follows:
Q Ratio = (Total Market Value of Firm) divided by (Total Asset Value of Firm)
= $525,000,000 / $450,000,000
= 1.17
As the calculation says, this company’s market valuation is greater compared to the replacement cost. This shows the firm is likely to be overpriced and ripe for a possible takeover.
Interpreting Results
Utilized to calculate a company’s value, it’s important to understand how the resulting calculation works. If the resulting calculation is less than 1, a company’s booked assets hold more value than the value of its equity worth. An organization’s calculation under 1 implies that its market valuation is undervalued. It can be interpreted as a potential acquisition target by another company that can exploit its untapped value.
When a company’s Q ratio exceeds 1, its market value is greater than the book value (or replacement cost) of its assets. A high Q ratio often indicates that the market is placing value on unrecorded intangible assets – such as patents, brand equity or intellectual property – or expecting strong future growth, rather than simply meaning the company is overvalued. A ratio of more than 1 shows that a business’ earnings were greater compared to their assets replacement costs. This can be a sign that potential competitors may step in to create competition to garner a portion of the business’ profits.
When a company’s Q ratio is exactly 1, the company’s assets are said to be reasonably priced.
Considerations
Market speculation, along with intangible assets, there are two main sticking points when evaluating the resulting Q ratio. When analysts’ projections impact a business’ market valuation or price target, these market forecasts can’t necessarily be articulated via financial statement and accounting analysis. This can skew how the market values company equities. Market hype can’t be recorded in a company’s financial statements. Intangible assets or goodwill is the other component that cannot be fully valued – only estimated. The calculation must similarly be considered if a business holds extensive intellectual property, especially high-growth, technology-based companies.
While there are many ways to value a company or the entire equity market, understanding how this ratio is calculated is essential to being versatile with financial valuations.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
The tax brackets below apply to income earned during the 2026 calendar year. This is the income you report on the tax return due April 15, 2027 (or Oct. 15 with an extension). These are the final, official figures. The…
⏱ 4 min read
The tax brackets below apply to income earned during the 2026 calendar year. This is the income you report on the tax return due April 15, 2027 (or Oct. 15 with an extension). These are the final, official figures. The IRS published them on Oct. 9, 2025, in Revenue Procedure 2025-32, and they are the first set to reflect the July 2025 tax overhaul known as OBBBA (Public Law 119-21, formally titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act). Most inflation-indexed amounts rose about 2.3 percent over 2025. The 10 percent and 12 percent brackets rose about 4 percent because OBBBA gave the two lowest brackets one extra year of indexing. The seven rates themselves did not move, and OBBBA wrote them into law for good.
Individual Tax Rates and Brackets
The grid below covers all four filing statuses for 2026. Each cell is the highest amount of taxable income taxed at that row’s rate; anything beyond it spills into the next rate. Your taxable income is whatever remains after you subtract the standard deduction or your itemized deductions from adjusted gross income.
Individual Income Tax Brackets: Tax Year 2026 (Top of Each Bracket, Taxable Income)
Rate
Single
Joint
Separate
Head of Household
10%
$12,400
$24,800
$12,400
$17,700
12%
$50,400
$100,800
$50,400
$67,450
22%
$105,700
$211,400
$105,700
$105,700
24%
$201,775
$403,550
$201,775
$201,750
32%
$256,225
$512,450
$256,225
$256,200
35%
$640,600
$768,700
$384,350
$640,600
37%
Above $640,600
Above $768,700
Above $384,350
Above $640,600
Joint refers to spouses who combine everything on one return; Separate refers to spouses who each file on their own. Separate filers use the single thresholds through the 32 percent bracket, but their 35 percent bracket ends at $384,350, half of the joint figure.
Trusts & Estates Tax Brackets
Trusts and estates get their own, much narrower, rate schedule. The top rate arrives once taxable income passes just $16,000.
Trusts and Estates Tax Brackets: Tax Year 2026
Taxable Income
Rate
Up to $3,300
10%
$3,300 to $11,700
24%
$11,700 to $16,000
35%
Beyond $16,000
37%
Standard Deductions
Here is the 2026 standard deduction for each filing status alongside the prior year. The 2025 column shows the amounts after OBBBA retroactively raised them in July 2025, not the lower figures the IRS had announced in late 2024. OBBBA also locked in the larger deduction going forward.
Standard Deduction Amounts
Filing Status
2026
2025
Increase
Single
$16,100
$15,750
$350
Joint
$32,200
$31,500
$700
Separate
$16,100
$15,750
$350
Head of Household
$24,150
$23,625
$525
Taxpayers who are 65 or older, blind or both get an additional amount per condition: $2,050 if unmarried and not a surviving spouse, otherwise $1,650. Separately, OBBBA created a temporary deduction of $6,000 for each taxpayer 65 or older, available for the 2025 through 2028 tax years. It shrinks by 6 cents for every dollar of modified AGI beyond $75,000 for a single filer or $150,000 on a joint return.
AMT Exemptions and Phase-Outs
The table below shows the 2026 AMT exemptions and the income level at which each one starts to shrink.
AMT Exemption Amounts: Tax Year 2026
Filing Status
Phase-Out Starts At
Exemption
Joint (and surviving spouses)
$1,000,000
$140,200
Single filers and heads of household
$500,000
$90,100
Married, filing separately
$500,000
$70,100
Estates and trusts
$104,800
$31,400
The phase-out is where OBBBA bites. In 2025 a single filer kept the full exemption until alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI) passed $626,350, and a couple until $1,252,700. OBBBA pulled those starting points back to a flat $500,000 and $1,000,000 (indexing resumes after 2026) and made the exemption disappear twice as fast: each dollar of AMTI beyond the threshold now wipes out half a dollar of exemption instead of a quarter. A single filer has no exemption left at $680,200 of AMTI, and a couple at $1,280,400.
Capital Gains
How a capital gain is taxed depends first on how long you owned the asset. Short-term gains, from assets owned 12 months or less, are added to your other income and taxed at the ordinary rates above. Long-term gains come from assets owned longer than 12 months. The three rates (0 percent, 15 percent and 20 percent) are unchanged for 2026, but the taxable income levels that separate them have moved up. The table shows the top of the 0 percent band and the top of the 15 percent band for each filing status; anything higher is taxed at 20 percent.
Long-Term Capital Gains Thresholds: Tax Year 2026
Filing Status
Top of 0% Band
Top of 15% Band
Single
$49,450
$545,500
Joint
$98,900
$613,700
Separate
$49,450
$306,850
Head of Household
$66,200
$579,600
Estates and trusts
$3,300
$16,250
Note that the 20 percent rate does not begin where the 37 percent bracket begins. A single filer reaches 20 percent once taxable income passes $545,500, roughly $95,000 before the 37 percent bracket starts at $640,600. Collectibles are capped at a 28 percent rate, and the 3.8 percent net investment income tax still applies above $200,000 of modified AGI ($250,000 for joint filers).
Conclusion
Use these amounts as a guide in understanding your tax situation for 2026, when you prepare and submit the return in 2027. Because these are official IRS figures rather than projections, you can rely on them now for withholding, estimated payments and year-end planning. They are also a good starting point for a conversation with your tax advisor.
2026 Tax Brackets, Standard Deductions and More
November 1, 2026 · Blog, Tax and Financial News
⏱ 4 min read
The tax brackets below apply to income earned during the 2026 calendar year. This is the income you report on the tax return due April 15, 2027 (or Oct. 15 with an extension). These are the final, official figures. The IRS published them on Oct. 9, 2025, in Revenue Procedure 2025-32, and they are the first set to reflect the July 2025 tax overhaul known as OBBBA (Public Law 119-21, formally titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act). Most inflation-indexed amounts rose about 2.3 percent over 2025. The 10 percent and 12 percent brackets rose about 4 percent because OBBBA gave the two lowest brackets one extra year of indexing. The seven rates themselves did not move, and OBBBA wrote them into law for good.
Individual Tax Rates and Brackets
The grid below covers all four filing statuses for 2026. Each cell is the highest amount of taxable income taxed at that row’s rate; anything beyond it spills into the next rate. Your taxable income is whatever remains after you subtract the standard deduction or your itemized deductions from adjusted gross income.
Individual Income Tax Brackets: Tax Year 2026 (Top of Each Bracket, Taxable Income)
Rate
Single
Joint
Separate
Head of Household
10%
$12,400
$24,800
$12,400
$17,700
12%
$50,400
$100,800
$50,400
$67,450
22%
$105,700
$211,400
$105,700
$105,700
24%
$201,775
$403,550
$201,775
$201,750
32%
$256,225
$512,450
$256,225
$256,200
35%
$640,600
$768,700
$384,350
$640,600
37%
Above $640,600
Above $768,700
Above $384,350
Above $640,600
Joint refers to spouses who combine everything on one return; Separate refers to spouses who each file on their own. Separate filers use the single thresholds through the 32 percent bracket, but their 35 percent bracket ends at $384,350, half of the joint figure.
Trusts & Estates Tax Brackets
Trusts and estates get their own, much narrower, rate schedule. The top rate arrives once taxable income passes just $16,000.
Trusts and Estates Tax Brackets: Tax Year 2026
Taxable Income
Rate
Up to $3,300
10%
$3,300 to $11,700
24%
$11,700 to $16,000
35%
Beyond $16,000
37%
Standard Deductions
Here is the 2026 standard deduction for each filing status alongside the prior year. The 2025 column shows the amounts after OBBBA retroactively raised them in July 2025, not the lower figures the IRS had announced in late 2024. OBBBA also locked in the larger deduction going forward.
Standard Deduction Amounts
Filing Status
2026
2025
Increase
Single
$16,100
$15,750
$350
Joint
$32,200
$31,500
$700
Separate
$16,100
$15,750
$350
Head of Household
$24,150
$23,625
$525
Taxpayers who are 65 or older, blind or both get an additional amount per condition: $2,050 if unmarried and not a surviving spouse, otherwise $1,650. Separately, OBBBA created a temporary deduction of $6,000 for each taxpayer 65 or older, available for the 2025 through 2028 tax years. It shrinks by 6 cents for every dollar of modified AGI beyond $75,000 for a single filer or $150,000 on a joint return.
AMT Exemptions and Phase-Outs
The table below shows the 2026 AMT exemptions and the income level at which each one starts to shrink.
AMT Exemption Amounts: Tax Year 2026
Filing Status
Phase-Out Starts At
Exemption
Joint (and surviving spouses)
$1,000,000
$140,200
Single filers and heads of household
$500,000
$90,100
Married, filing separately
$500,000
$70,100
Estates and trusts
$104,800
$31,400
The phase-out is where OBBBA bites. In 2025 a single filer kept the full exemption until alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI) passed $626,350, and a couple until $1,252,700. OBBBA pulled those starting points back to a flat $500,000 and $1,000,000 (indexing resumes after 2026) and made the exemption disappear twice as fast: each dollar of AMTI beyond the threshold now wipes out half a dollar of exemption instead of a quarter. A single filer has no exemption left at $680,200 of AMTI, and a couple at $1,280,400.
Capital Gains
How a capital gain is taxed depends first on how long you owned the asset. Short-term gains, from assets owned 12 months or less, are added to your other income and taxed at the ordinary rates above. Long-term gains come from assets owned longer than 12 months. The three rates (0 percent, 15 percent and 20 percent) are unchanged for 2026, but the taxable income levels that separate them have moved up. The table shows the top of the 0 percent band and the top of the 15 percent band for each filing status; anything higher is taxed at 20 percent.
Long-Term Capital Gains Thresholds: Tax Year 2026
Filing Status
Top of 0% Band
Top of 15% Band
Single
$49,450
$545,500
Joint
$98,900
$613,700
Separate
$49,450
$306,850
Head of Household
$66,200
$579,600
Estates and trusts
$3,300
$16,250
Note that the 20 percent rate does not begin where the 37 percent bracket begins. A single filer reaches 20 percent once taxable income passes $545,500, roughly $95,000 before the 37 percent bracket starts at $640,600. Collectibles are capped at a 28 percent rate, and the 3.8 percent net investment income tax still applies above $200,000 of modified AGI ($250,000 for joint filers).
Conclusion
Use these amounts as a guide in understanding your tax situation for 2026, when you prepare and submit the return in 2027. Because these are official IRS figures rather than projections, you can rely on them now for withholding, estimated payments and year-end planning. They are also a good starting point for a conversation with your tax advisor.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
With the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market…
⏱ 3 min read
With the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the global bond market’s capitalization is more than $128 trillion.
Defining Bonds
Offered by government or corporate entities, bonds are a static commitment issued to investors. Entities earn money from investors to invest in infrastructure or support operations. Investors receive a coupon payment periodically, and the bond is settled at a future date, which is referred to as the maturity date.
When bonds are tendered, they may be done at a discount, at face value, or at a premium. The valuation relies on the gap at issuance between a bond’s coupon rate and the bond’s yield based on prevailing prices. Upon bond issuance, the bond’s face value is recorded under bonds payable, as the issuing entity receives payment for the bond’s prevailing market value. If there’s a positive difference, it’s recorded at a premium. If there’s a negative difference, it’s recorded at a discount.
Bond Issuance and Accounting Considerations
When sold at par value, after the corporation or government entity receives payment from investors, the issuing entity records it as a liability because it’s liable for the investor’s investment. This would be set up as:
Debit
Credit
Cash
$100
Bonds Payable
$100
Bonds Payable Defined
Since the entity owes the investor, bonds payable is recorded on the liability section of a business’ balance sheet. Much of the time, bonds payable are reported as non-current liabilities.
When sold at a discount, a gap exists between a bond’s par value and the monetary investment the issuing entity obtains from the investor; the issuing entity must record the transaction as a discount on bonds payable account. The journal entry is as follows:
Debit
Credit
Cash
$100
Discount on Bonds Payable
$100
$100
Bonds Payable
$100
If bonds are purchased at a premium, which is when investors pay more for a bond with a higher interest rate, providing higher coupon payments, entities must record it as a premium on bonds payable (POBP) account. It often occurs when purchasers agree to lesser earnings due to the bond having a higher rate than prevailing rates. In the case of a bond’s issuance at a premium, it can be recorded as follows:
Debit
Credit
Cash
$100
POBP
$100
Bonds Payable
$100
If there’s a discount on bonds payable, the recurrent record must reflect the interest expense with a debit transaction and the bonds payable entry must see a credit. This accounting method impacts the bond issuer by growing the total interest expense, which the issuer records.
If, however, the issuer receives payment from investors beyond the face value, the interest expense must be credited, and the premium on bonds payable entry should receive a debit.
Conclusion
Whether it’s a business issuing bonds or an investor evaluating a company, understanding how to account for bonds is essential to evaluate a business’ financial health.
How to Account for Bonds
October 1, 2026 · Accounting News, Blog
⏱ 3 min read
With the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the global bond market’s capitalization is more than $128 trillion.
Defining Bonds
Offered by government or corporate entities, bonds are a static commitment issued to investors. Entities earn money from investors to invest in infrastructure or support operations. Investors receive a coupon payment periodically, and the bond is settled at a future date, which is referred to as the maturity date.
When bonds are tendered, they may be done at a discount, at face value, or at a premium. The valuation relies on the gap at issuance between a bond’s coupon rate and the bond’s yield based on prevailing prices. Upon bond issuance, the bond’s face value is recorded under bonds payable, as the issuing entity receives payment for the bond’s prevailing market value. If there’s a positive difference, it’s recorded at a premium. If there’s a negative difference, it’s recorded at a discount.
Bond Issuance and Accounting Considerations
When sold at par value, after the corporation or government entity receives payment from investors, the issuing entity records it as a liability because it’s liable for the investor’s investment. This would be set up as:
Debit
Credit
Cash
$100
Bonds Payable
$100
Bonds Payable Defined
Since the entity owes the investor, bonds payable is recorded on the liability section of a business’ balance sheet. Much of the time, bonds payable are reported as non-current liabilities.
When sold at a discount, a gap exists between a bond’s par value and the monetary investment the issuing entity obtains from the investor; the issuing entity must record the transaction as a discount on bonds payable account. The journal entry is as follows:
Debit
Credit
Cash
$100
Discount on Bonds Payable
$100
$100
Bonds Payable
$100
If bonds are purchased at a premium, which is when investors pay more for a bond with a higher interest rate, providing higher coupon payments, entities must record it as a premium on bonds payable (POBP) account. It often occurs when purchasers agree to lesser earnings due to the bond having a higher rate than prevailing rates. In the case of a bond’s issuance at a premium, it can be recorded as follows:
Debit
Credit
Cash
$100
POBP
$100
Bonds Payable
$100
If there’s a discount on bonds payable, the recurrent record must reflect the interest expense with a debit transaction and the bonds payable entry must see a credit. This accounting method impacts the bond issuer by growing the total interest expense, which the issuer records.
If, however, the issuer receives payment from investors beyond the face value, the interest expense must be credited, and the premium on bonds payable entry should receive a debit.
Conclusion
Whether it’s a business issuing bonds or an investor evaluating a company, understanding how to account for bonds is essential to evaluate a business’ financial health.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed…
⏱ 4 min read
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate on Sept. 1. The act funds the fiscal year 2027 government budget through Dec. 11 at current levels. It was signed by the President on Sept. 2.
Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act (S 307) – This bill is designed to address sexual harassment and sexual assault of Bureau of Prisons correctional officers and other staff by incarcerated prisoners. Specifically, it details national standards for the prevention, reduction, and punishment of perpetrators. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) on Jan. 29, 2025. It passed in the Senate on April 29, 2025; in the House on Aug. 31; and was enacted by the president on Sept. 16.
Retire through Ownership Act (S 2403) – Introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) on July 23, 2025, this bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. ESOPs are Employee Stock Ownership Plans that enable employees to accrue shares of their employers’ stock as part of a pension plan, in which they receive the cash value of their shares upon retirement. This bill clearly defines how a good-faith valuation should be determined by independent professional appraisers, based on IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60 for valuing privately held stock. In the past, ambiguous valuation methods have resulted in litigation. This act passed in the Senate on October 9, 2025, and in the House on Sept. 16. It currently awaits the president’s signature.
Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (HR 5334) – This largely bipartisan act was championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). The legislation imposes a variety of sanctions, tariffs, and prohibitions related to Russia and Iran, and explicitly prohibits U.S. persons from making new investments in Russia. It also expands the tax deduction for early childhood education teachers for classroom expenses. The bill was introduced on Sept. 11, 2025, by Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA). It passed in the House on April 27 and in the Senate on Aug. 7, with final changes agreed upon on Sept. 16. The president signed the bill into law a day later.
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (HR 3633) – Known as the Clarity Act, the purpose of this Trump Administration-backed bill is to implement the first regulations for the crypto sector. The bill was introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on May 29, 2025. It passed in the House on July 17, 2025. However, opponents of the bill say the industry-led standards are far too lenient and do not provide enough safeguards. The bill recently failed in the Senate after a party-line cloture vote, which means the debate ended before the floor could vote on the bill (considered a filibuster). The cloture vote does not rule out the Senate trying again at a later date.
Ratepayer Protection Act (HR 9340) – In an effort to rein in AI data center utility costs, this bill would require state utilities to consider adopting standards to ensure cost recovery for the generation, transmission, and distribution services of large-load electricity customers. This high-stakes, bipartisan issue comes ahead of the midterm elections in an effort to assure voters that local data centers will not ramp up local residents’ utility bills. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Gabe Evans (R-CO) on June 18. It passed in the House on Sept. 16 and currently resides in the Senate.
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act (HR 1342) – Current law states that federal major disaster emergency relief and assistance must be provided without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, nationality, sex, age, disability, English proficiency or economic status. The bill, introduced by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) on Feb. 13, 2025, would add political affiliation protection under this requirement. The act passed in the House on Sept. 16 and awaits consideration in the Senate.
Pre-Election Focus on Russian/Iran Sanctions, AI Utility Bills, Crypto Regulation and Nondiscriminatory FEMA Assistance
October 1, 2026 · Blog, Congress at Work
⏱ 4 min read
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate on Sept. 1. The act funds the fiscal year 2027 government budget through Dec. 11 at current levels. It was signed by the President on Sept. 2.
Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act (S 307) – This bill is designed to address sexual harassment and sexual assault of Bureau of Prisons correctional officers and other staff by incarcerated prisoners. Specifically, it details national standards for the prevention, reduction, and punishment of perpetrators. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) on Jan. 29, 2025. It passed in the Senate on April 29, 2025; in the House on Aug. 31; and was enacted by the president on Sept. 16.
Retire through Ownership Act (S 2403) – Introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) on July 23, 2025, this bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. ESOPs are Employee Stock Ownership Plans that enable employees to accrue shares of their employers’ stock as part of a pension plan, in which they receive the cash value of their shares upon retirement. This bill clearly defines how a good-faith valuation should be determined by independent professional appraisers, based on IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60 for valuing privately held stock. In the past, ambiguous valuation methods have resulted in litigation. This act passed in the Senate on October 9, 2025, and in the House on Sept. 16. It currently awaits the president’s signature.
Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (HR 5334) – This largely bipartisan act was championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). The legislation imposes a variety of sanctions, tariffs, and prohibitions related to Russia and Iran, and explicitly prohibits U.S. persons from making new investments in Russia. It also expands the tax deduction for early childhood education teachers for classroom expenses. The bill was introduced on Sept. 11, 2025, by Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA). It passed in the House on April 27 and in the Senate on Aug. 7, with final changes agreed upon on Sept. 16. The president signed the bill into law a day later.
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (HR 3633) – Known as the Clarity Act, the purpose of this Trump Administration-backed bill is to implement the first regulations for the crypto sector. The bill was introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on May 29, 2025. It passed in the House on July 17, 2025. However, opponents of the bill say the industry-led standards are far too lenient and do not provide enough safeguards. The bill recently failed in the Senate after a party-line cloture vote, which means the debate ended before the floor could vote on the bill (considered a filibuster). The cloture vote does not rule out the Senate trying again at a later date.
Ratepayer Protection Act (HR 9340) – In an effort to rein in AI data center utility costs, this bill would require state utilities to consider adopting standards to ensure cost recovery for the generation, transmission, and distribution services of large-load electricity customers. This high-stakes, bipartisan issue comes ahead of the midterm elections in an effort to assure voters that local data centers will not ramp up local residents’ utility bills. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Gabe Evans (R-CO) on June 18. It passed in the House on Sept. 16 and currently resides in the Senate.
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act (HR 1342) – Current law states that federal major disaster emergency relief and assistance must be provided without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, nationality, sex, age, disability, English proficiency or economic status. The bill, introduced by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) on Feb. 13, 2025, would add political affiliation protection under this requirement. The act passed in the House on Sept. 16 and awaits consideration in the Senate.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
For years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this…
⏱ 4 min read
For years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise, and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this.
Today, AI can create realistic voices, videos, emails, invoices, identities, and customer interactions at a scale and speed that traditional fraud controls were never designed to address. AI-powered fraud is a governance, financial, and strategic risk – not just an IT problem.
The Evolution of Corporate Fraud
Fraud is no longer limited to static phishing emails. Threat actors, from organized criminal syndicates to rogue insiders, use large language models and advanced machine learning to execute complex, multilayered fraud schemes.
One of the most cited reference cases is the 2024 Arup incident. A finance employee at the engineering firm’s Hong Kong office was tricked into transferring about $25 million across multiple transactions after joining a video conference call with deepfake replicas of the company’s CFO and other colleagues. The fraud succeeded because it targeted the human authorization step, the exact step where financial controls assume identity can be trusted on sight and sound.
Beyond deepfake executives, new trends include synthetic vendor creation, where generative models fabricate entire corporate entities. Each comes complete with tax IDs, websites, regulatory filings, and executive profiles. They are used to infiltrate accounts payable systems. Bad actors also use machine learning to reverse-engineer enterprise anti-fraud algorithms, find blind spots, and execute micro-transactions that stay beneath detection thresholds.
Why the Numbers Should Worry Boards, Not Just Security Teams
The 2026 INTERPOL Global Financial Fraud Threat Assessment flagged AI-powered fraud as one of organized crime’s primary growth sectors. It reports that fraud alerts have risen 54 percent since 2024, with more than 1,500 cross-border cases involving $1.1 billion in lost assets.
The Regulatory Gap Executives Should Worry About
Regulation is accelerating, but it is not solving the fraud problem. The EU AI Act’s transparency provisions took effect Aug. 2. It requires the disclosure of AI-generated content, with penalties for noncompliance. As of July 2026, 48 states in the United States have enacted at least one deepfake-related law, according to Ballotpedia’s tracker. Yet none of these frameworks is really built for enterprise fraud. They target content moderation, disclosure, and non-consensual media. None directly addresses the authorization workflows attackers actually exploit. A company that is fully compliant with deepfake laws would still be exposed by the Arup scenario.
Regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have signaled that using AI to deceive is prosecutable under existing fraud statutes, but enforcement is reactive and case-by-case. Executives who treat fraud as just a criminal act rather than a governance failure arising from inadequate technical oversight face severe personal and corporate liability.
Strategic Challenges and Recommended Actions
Defending against AI-powered fraud requires rethinking how security spending is justified. Traditional ROI models rely on historical loss avoidance, but in the age of generative fraud, past losses are an unreliable predictor of future exposure.
The primary implementation challenge is friction versus security. Deploying stronger authentication and behavior monitoring across corporate touchpoints creates friction that employees and vendors resist. In addition, integrating AI defenses into legacy enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems creates technical debt. Organizations also struggle with data silos, even though fraud detection now requires real-time visibility across all departments.
To protect enterprise value, leadership teams should move from passive compliance to active resilience.
Verify out of band. Require a callback to a known number and dual approval for large or unusual transfers. Never authorize a payment on a voice or video request alone.
Strengthen authentication. Use multifactor cryptographic verification and zero-trust principles (verify every request, regardless of source). Treat biometrics with caution, since deepfakes can spoof them.
Red-team for AI fraud. Have ethical hackers use generative AI to stress test internal systems and give the risk committee ownership of the results.
Use AI to fight AI. Deploy monitoring tools that flag behavioral anomalies across internal communications, ledger entries, and vendor registries in real time.
Establish cross-functional fraud task forces. Break down departmental silos and treat fraud detection as an integrated business process.
Future Outlook
As AI advances, the convergence of generative AI and autonomous software agents suggest that corporate fraud may increasingly be automated, including by self-directed AI agents operating as fraud syndicates. Business leaders must recognize that the future of corporate defense relies not on human vigilance alone, but on building resilient, self-healing digital ecosystems where trust is algorithmically verified and continuously audited.
AI-Powered Corporate Fraud: What Business Leaders Need to Know
October 1, 2026 · Blog, What's New in Technology
⏱ 4 min read
For years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise, and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this.
Today, AI can create realistic voices, videos, emails, invoices, identities, and customer interactions at a scale and speed that traditional fraud controls were never designed to address. AI-powered fraud is a governance, financial, and strategic risk – not just an IT problem.
The Evolution of Corporate Fraud
Fraud is no longer limited to static phishing emails. Threat actors, from organized criminal syndicates to rogue insiders, use large language models and advanced machine learning to execute complex, multilayered fraud schemes.
One of the most cited reference cases is the 2024 Arup incident. A finance employee at the engineering firm’s Hong Kong office was tricked into transferring about $25 million across multiple transactions after joining a video conference call with deepfake replicas of the company’s CFO and other colleagues. The fraud succeeded because it targeted the human authorization step, the exact step where financial controls assume identity can be trusted on sight and sound.
Beyond deepfake executives, new trends include synthetic vendor creation, where generative models fabricate entire corporate entities. Each comes complete with tax IDs, websites, regulatory filings, and executive profiles. They are used to infiltrate accounts payable systems. Bad actors also use machine learning to reverse-engineer enterprise anti-fraud algorithms, find blind spots, and execute micro-transactions that stay beneath detection thresholds.
Why the Numbers Should Worry Boards, Not Just Security Teams
The 2026 INTERPOL Global Financial Fraud Threat Assessment flagged AI-powered fraud as one of organized crime’s primary growth sectors. It reports that fraud alerts have risen 54 percent since 2024, with more than 1,500 cross-border cases involving $1.1 billion in lost assets.
The Regulatory Gap Executives Should Worry About
Regulation is accelerating, but it is not solving the fraud problem. The EU AI Act’s transparency provisions took effect Aug. 2. It requires the disclosure of AI-generated content, with penalties for noncompliance. As of July 2026, 48 states in the United States have enacted at least one deepfake-related law, according to Ballotpedia’s tracker. Yet none of these frameworks is really built for enterprise fraud. They target content moderation, disclosure, and non-consensual media. None directly addresses the authorization workflows attackers actually exploit. A company that is fully compliant with deepfake laws would still be exposed by the Arup scenario.
Regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have signaled that using AI to deceive is prosecutable under existing fraud statutes, but enforcement is reactive and case-by-case. Executives who treat fraud as just a criminal act rather than a governance failure arising from inadequate technical oversight face severe personal and corporate liability.
Strategic Challenges and Recommended Actions
Defending against AI-powered fraud requires rethinking how security spending is justified. Traditional ROI models rely on historical loss avoidance, but in the age of generative fraud, past losses are an unreliable predictor of future exposure.
The primary implementation challenge is friction versus security. Deploying stronger authentication and behavior monitoring across corporate touchpoints creates friction that employees and vendors resist. In addition, integrating AI defenses into legacy enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems creates technical debt. Organizations also struggle with data silos, even though fraud detection now requires real-time visibility across all departments.
To protect enterprise value, leadership teams should move from passive compliance to active resilience.
Verify out of band. Require a callback to a known number and dual approval for large or unusual transfers. Never authorize a payment on a voice or video request alone.
Strengthen authentication. Use multifactor cryptographic verification and zero-trust principles (verify every request, regardless of source). Treat biometrics with caution, since deepfakes can spoof them.
Red-team for AI fraud. Have ethical hackers use generative AI to stress test internal systems and give the risk committee ownership of the results.
Use AI to fight AI. Deploy monitoring tools that flag behavioral anomalies across internal communications, ledger entries, and vendor registries in real time.
Establish cross-functional fraud task forces. Break down departmental silos and treat fraud detection as an integrated business process.
Future Outlook
As AI advances, the convergence of generative AI and autonomous software agents suggest that corporate fraud may increasingly be automated, including by self-directed AI agents operating as fraud syndicates. Business leaders must recognize that the future of corporate defense relies not on human vigilance alone, but on building resilient, self-healing digital ecosystems where trust is algorithmically verified and continuously audited.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Be it an internal or external valuation, there’s a bevy of options to value a business with ratios. Examples include price-to-earnings, price-to-sales or EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization). Along with these available valuation options, another valuation option is the Q Ratio.
The tax brackets below apply to income earned during the 2026 calendar year. This is the income you report on the tax return due April 15, 2027 (or Oct. 15 with an extension).
With the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the global bond market’s capitalization is more than $128 trillion.
Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate on Sept. 1. The act funds the fiscal year 2027 government budget through Dec. 11 at current levels. It was signed by the President on Sept. 2.
For years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise, and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this.