Bond Investment Strategies

Bonds are designed to deliver both capital preservation and income, and are generally considered lower risk than stock investing. The purchase price of a bond is basically a loan to an issuer, such as the federal government…

5 min read

Bond Investment StrategiesBonds are designed to deliver both capital preservation and income, and are generally considered lower risk than stock investing. The purchase price of a bond is basically a loan to an issuer, such as the federal government, a municipal government, or a corporation. The term of the loan is determined for a specific period of time – referred to as the maturity date.

During that time, the issuer uses bond money to fund projects, and in return pays the buyer interest over the term of the loan. Once the term ends, the bond issuer pays back the money it borrowed (i.e., the purchase price). The interest is paid on a predetermined schedule – quarterly, semiannually, or annually. The interest rate on a bond is called the coupon rate, and it is fixed at the time of issuance and remains the same until the bond matures.

For example, say you purchase a 10-year bond for $10,000 with a coupon rate of 4 percent, paid twice a year.. Over the 10 years you’ll collect $4,000 in interest, and at maturity you get your $10,000 back. That’s a 40 percent cumulative return on the original investment.

Bonds with a maturity date of less than four years are considered short-term; between four and 10 years are considered intermediate-term bonds; and terms of 10 or more years are considered long-term bonds. Bonds can be useful in many ways, such as to provide income, save for a particular expense, or to seek out high interest rates for a higher total return. The following are a few bond strategies to address each type of objective.

Objective: Generate Income

To generate income over a long period of time – when interest rates tend to fluctuate – one strategy is to ladder bond holdings. This means purchasing a portfolio of individual bonds with varying maturity dates. For example, you may spread out your bond terms from one to 30 years – with each interval acting as a rung on this metaphorical ladder. Note that each type of bond is rated for the credit quality of the issuer, which reflects its likelihood of default. The lower the credit rating, the higher the interest paid to compensate for the issuer’s extra risk.

As each bond matures, you can reinvest money into another bond based on the current prices and coupon rates on offer at that time. This way you may continue to shop for higher coupon rates every few years without locking up all of your money for a 10-, 20-, or 30-year duration. When rates are on the rise, you can secure a higher yield as your bonds mature. If rates are falling, reinvest that money in a short-term bond as a holding pattern until coupon rates increase again. This way, you continue to benefit from owning longer-term bonds purchased when rates were higher. Barring any defaults, the ladder continues to grow and offer steady growth for bond assets.

Objective: Save for a Particular Expense

The Bullet strategy is a simple way to generate the money you need for a specific financial goal within a specific time frame – such as buying a house in five years, or saving for college or a retirement nest egg in 10 or 20 years. You basically purchase bonds with a similar maturity date. Between the purchase price and the generated income, you’ll know exactly how much you will receive when those bonds mature. It’s like shooting a bullet straight toward your financial goal.

Objective: Seek Higher Interest

The Barbell strategy splits your money between the two ends of the maturity range and skips the middle. You hold short-term bonds on one end and long-term bonds on the other, with little or nothing in between, much like the weights sitting at either end of a barbell.

The long end captures the higher coupon rates that generally come with committing money for a longer period. The short end keeps a portion of your money coming due on a regular basis, so each time one of those bonds matures, you can re-evaluate rates and decide where that money goes next. If rates have moved higher, shift it to the long end and lock in the better coupon. If rates remain tepid, buy another short-term bond and wait. The result is a portfolio that captures much of the yield available at the long end without committing everything to a rate you may later regret.

There are many different types of bonds, including federal government, municipal government, and corporate bonds. While government bonds are generally considered safe, each bond is issued a credit rating based on the issuer’s financial health, creditworthiness, and past history of repaying debt obligations. Investors also have the option to invest in bond funds, which offer a large selection of bonds and do not require investments to be held to maturity. However, bond fund interest rates fluctuate daily, and there is no guarantee the investor will receive the original principal amount when they cash out of the fund.

Understanding Inflation Accounting

According to the July 12, 2026, Consumer Price Index Release from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 12-month inflation rate rose by 3.4 percent and the month-over-month measure rose by 0.1 percent in July 2026…

3 min read

Understanding Inflation AccountingAccording to the July 12, 2026, Consumer Price Index Release from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the 12-month inflation rate rose by 3.4 percent, and the month-over-month measure rose by 0.1 percent in July 2026 compared to June 2026. With inflation higher than normal over the past few years compared to near-term historical averages, understanding how inflation is accounted for is essential for companies to interpret it properly. 

Defining Inflation & Accounting Needs

This reporting technique adjusts a business’ financial statements that accounts for inflation-related price changes. By adjusting for a price index, it updates financial statements to show a business’s true financial position and ensure consistency over time.

Whether it’s inflation or deflation, this type of accounting is used during periods of significant price fluctuations. It’s especially important for publicly traded, multinational corporations and how they report their finances since investors look at their performance on a quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year basis.

There are two primary methods: current purchasing power (CPP) and current cost accounting (CCA). CPP looks at monetary and nonmonetary items as separate spheres. Examples of monetary assets include cash, investments, accounts and notes receivable – essentially an asset that can be turned into a determinable monetary figure. Non-monetary assets can take the form of tangible assets like those in a business’ property, plant or equipment line item. Intellectual property and goodwill are other examples of non-monetary assets.

While nonmonetary items are indexed based upon a metric such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), with the CPP method using historical costs as the baseline numbers, monetary items are evaluated to see what value the items may have gained or lost during the period analyzed. 

CCA analyzes asset values at their fair market value, not their historical cost or the price paid for assets when originally reported. The following example illustrates how the CPP model calculates it:

A company bought equipment in 2010 for $15,000 based upon a price index of 200, and in 2026 the established price index rose to 400. Based on taking the new price index of 400, divided by the previous price index of 200 (400/200 = 2), the original purchase price of $15,000 is to be multiplied by the conversion factor of 2 = $15,000 x 2 = $30,000.

When the company goes to account for it on their financial statements, it would be recorded on its balance sheet on the line item “closing equipment balance” for the $30,000.

Why Restating Financial Statements is Important

It’s important to ensure a business’ historical information is relevant, along with their financial statements providing internal and external audiences an accurate perspective of what inflation and deflation do. During periods of high inflation or deflation, if the data is not indexed accordingly, it’s inaccurate. The primary benefit is that business’ income and expenses are represented and comparable with other companies and historical information.  

While each business and its asset inventory is different, understanding how deflation and inflation impact businesses is an important consideration for daily operations and external audiences who may lend or invest in a company.

How to Account for Bolt-On Acquisitions

With over $4 trillion in merger and acquisition transactions happening in 2025, understanding the necessary accounting considerations is essential to see how tax professionals can navigate…

3 min read

How to Account for Bolt-On AcquisitionsWith over $4 trillion in merger and acquisition transactions happening in 2025, understanding the necessary accounting considerations is essential to see how tax professionals can navigate financial statements.

Defining Bolt-On Acquisitions

This process is often used by private equity companies and occurs when a bigger business acquires a smaller company, providing investors with synergistic performance. This happens because the smaller company gives the bigger company a faster edge through complementary services, products or geographical advantages without having to do research and development from scratch. It also provides the acquiring business with new market access, further increasing the value of an acquisition for the acquiring company.

Bolt-On Versus Tuck-In Acquisitions

Bolt-on companies still have some level of autonomy and keep some of their unique brand identity post-acquisition, despite the acquired assets being integrated into the acquiring company’s overall structure. This contrasts with tuck-in acquisitions, where this type of acquisition completely absorbs the entire assets of the acquired company into the acquiring company.

Defining Asset Acquisition & Accounting Treatment

FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations, further defines asset acquisitions, including bolt-on acquisitions.

Asset acquisitions are defined as the complete fair value of the acquired assets as defined by similarly identifiable attributes. By meeting the so-called “screen test,” ASC 805 defines it as an asset acquisition. Based upon this type of transaction, acquirers are required to account for it via ASC 805-50’s cost model.

Transaction expenses, including immediately attributable and additive expenses the company sees during the asset acquisition period, are factored into the purchased asset(s) costs. This lowers expenses during the acquisition’s time frame compared to a business combination, which results in greater depreciation expenses over the acquired asset’s life.

Another consideration for asset acquisitions is failing to recognize goodwill. Assets could have a higher basis that’s subject to depreciation or amortization if the value is reported higher than the asset’s fair value. Similarly, when it comes to ASC 842-10-35-3, unless the lease is materially changed, the acquirer must maintain the acquiree’s same lease circumstances.

Defining Business Acquisition

ASC 805 defines a business as a functional combination of assets and processes, featuring novel methods for developing significant input, in order to create new outcomes. This is a subjective process that ASC 805 describes in depth and often requires expertise to make a judgment call. According to ASC 805-10, accounting considerations for business combinations include measuring liabilities and assets at fair value. Legal and consulting transaction costs beginning with the acquisition preparation through the acquisition date should be expensed.

Goodwill is recognized as an asset and evaluated once a year for impairment. Like an asset acquisition, lease classification is kept the same as the acquired company, unless the lease agreement has material alterations.

Conclusion

While there are many different types of acquisition considerations and relevant procedures required, understanding how to navigate bolt-on acquisitions is essential to make the most of accounting for mergers and acquisitions in 2026 and beyond.

Extending Daylight Hours, Protecting Cultural Livelihoods and Making Local Banking Easier

Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 (HR 139) – The purpose of this legislation is to make daylight savings time (DST) permanent for most of the country. States…

3 min read

Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 (HR 139)Sunshine Protection Act of 2025 (HR 139) – The purpose of this legislation is to make daylight savings time (DST) permanent for most of the country. States and territories presently exempt from DST may choose the standard time for those areas. This latest version of the bill was introduced by Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-FL) on Jan. 3, 2025. The Act passed in the House on July 14 and faces a mix of cross-aisle opposition and support in the Senate.

Lulu’s Law (S 1003) – Introduced on March 12, 2025, by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL), this Act authorizes the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to issue emergency alerts to mobile phones in the event of a shark attack (similar to other alerts, such as severe weather, missing children, etc.). The bill passed in the Senate on July 8, 2025, in the House on May 20 and was signed into law on June 26.

Artist Act (S 254) – The Artist Act amends the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 by prohibiting states from imposing bans specifically on Alaska Native handicrafts and marine mammal ivory products. The bill is designed to protect the cultural practices and livelihood of Native American artists that create handicrafts and clothing using marine mammal ivory, bone or baleen. Introduced by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-AK) on Jan. 24, 2025, the bill passed in the Senate on Oct. 8, 2025, and in the House on June 3. It was enacted by the president on June 12.

A bill to amend chapters 83 and 84 of title 5, United States Code, to authorize an increase of the retirement age for members of the Capitol Police (S 4530) – Prior to this amendment, members of the Capitol Police were required to retire either at age 57 or, if older than 57, upon completing 20 years of service. A previous waiver enabled officers to continue working until age 60. This bill increases the retirement age to between ages 57 and 62, when such a waiver is in the public interest. The bipartisan bill was introduced by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on May 14. It passed in the Senate on May 15, the House on May 19, and became law on May 29.

American Access to Banking Act (HR 4544) – This law is designed to increase the number of community banks by making it easier to start them. Introduced by Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) on July 17, 2025, it passed 405-4 in the House on May 20 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.

Community Bank Deposit Access Act of 2025 (HR 5317) – This bill would create exemptions to FDIC rules that allow banks greater flexibility in funding loans. Specifically, the Act would alter how certain types of deposits are treated so they are no longer classified as brokered deposits. The legislation was introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on Sept. 11, 2025. It passed in the House on May 20 and currently resides in the Senate.

The Death of the App: Why Your Business Will Sideline SaaS Dashboards

For two decades, enterprise software has been built around a simple assumption: people log into multiple applications to retrieve information, make decisions and complete work. A CRM, a project tracker, a business intelligence…

4 min read

Sideline SaaS DashboardsFor two decades, enterprise software has been built around a simple assumption: people log into multiple applications to retrieve information, make decisions, and complete work. A CRM, a project tracker, a business intelligence dashboard, a support ticketing system, and more. All this is because these applications operate in isolation.

There is a shift whose intention is not eliminating SaaS applications. It’s about eliminating the need to constantly switch between them.

Why Dashboards Existed

Dashboards were built because software couldn’t interpret business intent. Humans had to retrieve, interpret charts, and decide what to do next. While dashboards were designed for human navigation, these static SaaS front ends are being replaced by dynamic, real-time interface synthesis.

The dashboard model worked when companies relied on a handful of applications. Today, enterprises manage hundreds of SaaS tools. An average large enterprise runs multiple SaaS applications – about 291 with large organizations scaling over 400. This makes constant switching a productivity problem rather than convenience.

A Harvard Business Review study revealed that digital workers toggle between different applications and websites about 1,200 times a day. This tool-switching alone costs employees an average of 44 hours per year due to tool fatigue. Meanwhile, most of the enterprise SaaS stack goes completely unused, and this is a weighty business cost.

What is Actually Changing

The shift in business computing is not about adding another dashboard to the stack, but rather usurping its purpose. The enterprise interface is beginning to shift toward intent-native workspaces, reducing the need to navigate traditional dashboards for routine work.

In comes agentic AI, which collapses the decision chain. Instead of opening a chart to figure out what it means, the user states an intent and an agent queries the underlying systems directly, synthesizes across them, and gives the user an answer or takes the action itself. For example, instead of a user logging into five different systems, a finance agent pulls real-time vendor invoices from an ERP, a legal agent scans contract terms, and a risk agent cross-references historical delivery delays. All coordinated by an orchestration layer.

Generative user interface (GenUI) technology pairs with this orchestration. Instead of presenting the same dashboard to everyone, a GenUI system generates a temporary interface tailored to the user’s immediate request. Once the task is complete, that interface disappears. If a user inputs their intention, such as checking which supplier poses a risk, the system dynamically renders a clean, interactive panel showing only the relevant vendor risk scores.

A survey by CrewAI on 2026 State of Agentic AI Survey found that adoption of agentic AI is moving fast. Of the 500 senior enterprise executives surveyed, 65 percent are already using AI agents, 81 percent have fully adopted and are actively scaling, and 100 percent plan to expand agentic AI use in 2026.

What Still Matters

Dashboards aren’t disappearing; their role is changing. The shift is not toward a better dashboard; it is to create systems that decide and act directly, with humans overseeing outcomes and not every step. Modern AI-driven operations demand speed that previous tools can’t cope with. Having insights without action is now a bottleneck. Static views, manual interpretation, and the lack of proactive alerts and personalized framing are limitations that drive the shift toward agents.

However, while agentic AI determines what happens next, the dashboards will keep documenting the process. They will also exist mainly as audit trails and compliance records, but not as the primary way work gets done.

What This Means for Your Business

For businesses evaluating software, appearance is becoming less important than accessibility. A polished dashboard matters little if AI agents can’t access its data or trigger actions. As enterprises increasingly rely on AI agents to automate work across multiple systems, software without strong AI integration risks becoming difficult to use, costly to upgrade, and easier to replace.

Logistically, this means businesses should start auditing their software stack for API maturity and AI agent readiness. Before renewing or purchasing new software contracts, a business should evaluate whether the platform has robust APIs, allows AI agents to securely access its data and perform actions, and is built to support an AI-driven workflow.

Conclusion

The biggest disruption is not the end of SaaS dashboards – it’s the end of software that waits for human input. The next generation of enterprise software won’t compete on who has the prettiest dashboard. It will compete on which platform gives AI agents the fastest, safest access to data and actions. Businesses that continue buying interfaces instead of intelligent access may soon find themselves paying for software no one opens.